Sean Sprague wrote:
>> Thanks very much for the update, Tom. I'll move this to 'suspended'.
>> Tom Whitten wrote:
>>> I've agreed to sponsor 6299120, but I've been unable to establish
>>> with Aswathy.S or Sruthi.P.Deep. I think that we should return
>>> 6299120 to
>>> the pool of available bugs.
>>> Aswathy or Sruthi if you still wish to work on this bug, please
>>> contact me.
> Tom appears to have been the "victim" of sponsoring fixes to two bugs
> here (this plus 6319973), for which he has sadly received no contact of
> late from the other side. From this, and that you have moved the status
> to "suspended", is there a mechanism that moves the bugs from
> "suspended" to "available again - no-one gave a crap last time"?
> Otherwise the "suspended" pool might grow and grow...
> Regards... Sean.
When a bug is moved to 'suspended', it is by definition available to
anyone to pick up. The original contributor can come back later and
request a sponsor again or someone else can pick it up and request a
That said, a quick check leads me to believe that this information is
perhaps not actually on the website......so let me think about how to
make this more clear......suggestions welcome.