>Why, other than the returning an error we already have 5 such privileges 
>in the basic set.  Now in each of those cases (proc_info, proc_session, 
>proc_fork, proc_exec, file_link_any) there is a way to return an error 
>for sync(2) but there is for 'lockfs -f'.

And it's exactly what the basic set is intended for.


Reply via email to