Sorry about that... It has been filed: 6414867.

It hasn't been assigned to the appropriate category/subcategory yet, 
which is why you can't find it on

- Karyn

Rainer Orth wrote:
> Two days ago, I opened a new CR on
> Revive UltraSPARC I support
> Unlike the flurry of other reports I submitted at the same time, I haven't
> received the CR id yet.  Anyway, this is a duplicate of
> 5004452 Should 64-bit UltraSPARC-I rise from the grave?
> which was previously closed as wontfix.  I have a large part of the
> (trivial/mechanical) fixes ready, but a couple of open questions remain
> before I post the webrev.  So I'm looking for a sponsor to help with those
> questions and guide me through the integration of this much-requested
> change.
> I've just received independent confirmation that an ufsboot built from the
> patched snv 20060327 sources allowed an Enterprise 4000 with 4 167 MHz CPUs
> to boot Solaris 10 successfully.
> Regards.
>       Rainer
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Rainer Orth, Faculty of Technology, Bielefeld University
> _______________________________________________
> request-sponsor mailing list
> request-sponsor at

Reply via email to