Richard Lowe wrote:
> Roland Mainz <roland.mainz at nrubsig.org> writes:
>
>   
>> jim.j.moore at sun.com wrote:
>>     
>>> *Synopsis*: "in.rwhod" lacks usable configuration
>>> Due to a change of Responsible manager requested by xxxxx at sun.com,
>>> xxxxx at sun.com is now the responsible manager for:
>>>
>>> CR 4296835 changed on Sep 3 2007 by xxxxx at sun.com
>>>
>>> === Field ============ === New Value ============= === Old Value 
>>> =============
>>>
>>> Responsible Manager    xxxxx at sun.com               xxxxx at sun.com
>>> Status                 4-Defer                     6-Fix Understood
>>> SubStatus              No Resource Available
>>>
>>> ====================== =========================== 
>>> ===========================
>>>       
>> Erm... why ? AFAIK I filed the sponsor request long ago and I just
>> waiting that a sponsor somehow magically appears... the "resource" who
>> writes the patch is available...
>>     
>
> I'd say the change should be reversed, and the bug keyworded
> oss-request, if it isn't already.
>
> (looking back through mail, it looks like you requested a sponsor for
> a duplicate, maybe the keyword didn't get moved when the newer was
> closed dup?)

Apologies, due to an organization change, thousands of bugs were being 
sorted and reassigned - I failed to spot the oss-request keyword in this 
case.  I've restored the previous state.  (Although a sponsor still 
needs to be forthcoming)

-Jimmo

Reply via email to