On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 16:40 -0400, Dan McDonald wrote:
> I can't recall the bugid, but there's an RFE out there for a
> lighter-weight KM_NOSLEEP, which has the semantics of KM_SLEEP but for the
> actual blocking, instead returning NULL.

6350858 need low-priority allocations which can fail


Reply via email to