I agree with your suggestion; I assume you don't need me to reissue the
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:55:48AM -0700, Tony Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Ceri,
> No problem. I agree that test case in the report is sufficient. I have one
> nit on the change.
> Lines 336-344: For correctness, I would prefer that we replace any '.' with
> '_' after the last strlcat. On the other hand, we know the last strlcat
> wouldn't add any '.' into the string so I'm also ok with the current fix.
> Let me know you decide to do. I have a workspace built with the fix and
> plan to run a quick test before integration.
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available