On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:28:13PM +0000, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> In addition to what Casper said addition of pfzsh would require ARC 
> approval.  Given that the FGAP project intends to do away with the 
> requirement for modified versions of the shell PSARC may or may not approve 
> the implementation of pfzsh using the existing method.

I agree; no harm done.

That must be wonderful!  I don't understand it at all.
                                                  -- Moliere
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available

Reply via email to