Brian Utterback wrote:

> Hey, you went from 57 to 59! What about #58?  Did I
> forget some keyword or something? It's on the report
> correctly.


I sent #58 two days ago, but I guess it didn't seem to make it into the 
lists or the forums or the archives. Poof. Gone. Just like all three 
emails I sent to OpenSolaris today. I'll re-send it.

Jim




> Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> 
>> Thanks to Richard Lowe for these three fixes below and to Steve Lau 
>> for sponsoring the work through to putback:
>>
>> Putback 59
>> ID: 6425482
>> Desc: .ed files try to match on inappropriate terms (SCCS keywords)
>> Submitted by Richard Lowe on 5/15/06
>> Sun Sponsor: Steve Lau    Putback to Nevada 41 on 5/19/06
>>
>> Putback 60
>> ID: 6425491
>> Desc: mkhdr.sh generates SCCS keywords
>> Submitted by Richard Lowe on 5/15/06
>> Sun Sponsor: Steve Lau
>> Putback to Nevada 41 on 5/19/06
>>
>> Putback 61
>> ID: 6425511
>> Desc: metassist keywords check should not check SCCS files
>> Submitted by Richard Lowe on 5/15/06
>> Sun Sponsor: Steve Lau
>> Putback to Nevada 41 on 5/19/06
>>
>> Full report: http://opensolaris.org/os/bug_reports/request_sponsor/
>>  
>>  
>> This message posted from opensolaris.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> request-sponsor mailing list
>> request-sponsor at opensolaris.org
> 
> 

Reply via email to