On Wed, 24 May 2006, Danek Duvall wrote:
> I think that asking the studio folks if they could remove their gvim and
> simply depend on the one delivered by the WOS.  This would only apply for
> Nevada and forward -- they could continue to ship gvim in their S10 DVD.
> You'd probably need to compile in certain options (they ship gvim netbeans-
> ready), but that should be pretty straightforward.
> That's certainly a better option than the reverse dependency.
> Danek

Agreed. I'll pursue that route.


P.S. I don't think there's a need to keep cross-posting
      this thread. Let's use sfwnv-discuss for future messages.

Reply via email to