Matt Simmons wrote On 10/21/05 14:57,:
> Dan Price wrote:
>>I don't agree with this structure, then. I think that at a minimum,
>>one should be considered a trained, qualified, and active contributor to
>>the release in question.
> Perhaps "you must be a Sun employee and you must have put back to the
> target gate within the last 6 months"?
This is what I was thinking. John and I were definitely assuming that
random engineers who had never worked in the O/N hierarchy would not be
wanting sponsor contributions. But we should specify this. I'll play