I'm working on this. But I'm not moving them to "accounted for" because
they aren't. I need a new category for situations like this - where our
lack of response has timed someone out. I'm discussing this with a
couple of people and will publish what I come up with on this list later
Until then, these need to stay where they are.
Karyn Ritter wrote On 10/23/05 23:55,:
> So we should take all of these off the "awaiting sponsor" list?
> Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
>>On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 12:27:34PM -0700, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
>>>>[PATCH] for bug 6249645 spec2trace passes Meta_info structure by value
>>>>contributor agreement # OS0004
>>>I'll pick this up. Shawn, I'll be in touch with you offline.
>>Due to a lack of time, Shawn has rescinded this request as well as all
>>his others. In this particular case, the consensus is that the bug is
>>not worth fixing anyway because spec2trace itself should be removed.
> request-sponsor mailing list
> request-sponsor at opensolaris.org