On Feb 12, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Knut Forkalsrud wrote:

> Daniel López wrote:
>> Knut, you seem to have a setup quite similar to ours, are you using  
>> 3.1
>> already or staying if 3.0? If you are using 3.1, are you experiencing
>> similiar issues or is it just me? ;).
>>
>
> We're on 3.0, but one of my short term objectives is to get us  
> migrated
> to 3.1.  I think we're almost there, although when I saw your mails
> about watchdog problems I paused for an extra check :-).  The problems
> you describe haven't struck us, at least not so far.  Then we haven't
> had the JVM freeze on us either.  We probably will not run into it
> either as long as we insist on different OS users/watchdogs per JVM.
>
> The confusion over watchdog port caught us by surprise as well, it  
> took
> a second or third close reading of the documentation to find that one.

Hmm.  I'd considered naming the cluster port "cluster-port" or "server- 
port" to avoid confusion and deprecating "port" on the <server>  
entirely.  That might be something to revisit.

-- Scott

>
>
> -Knut
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> resin-interest mailing list
> resin-interest@caucho.com
> http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest



_______________________________________________
resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest@caucho.com
http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest

Reply via email to