On Feb 12, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Knut Forkalsrud wrote:
> Daniel López wrote:
>> Knut, you seem to have a setup quite similar to ours, are you using
>> already or staying if 3.0? If you are using 3.1, are you experiencing
>> similiar issues or is it just me? ;).
> We're on 3.0, but one of my short term objectives is to get us
> to 3.1. I think we're almost there, although when I saw your mails
> about watchdog problems I paused for an extra check :-). The problems
> you describe haven't struck us, at least not so far. Then we haven't
> had the JVM freeze on us either. We probably will not run into it
> either as long as we insist on different OS users/watchdogs per JVM.
> The confusion over watchdog port caught us by surprise as well, it
> a second or third close reading of the documentation to find that one.
Hmm. I'd considered naming the cluster port "cluster-port" or "server-
port" to avoid confusion and deprecating "port" on the <server>
entirely. That might be something to revisit.
> resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest mailing list