On Mar 17, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Chad Cannell wrote: > What is the difference between tcp-store and cluster-store?
They're the same. cluster-store is the newer name. tcp-store is just for backward compatibility. If you turn on "finer" logging, you should see the size of the session getting stored. -- Scott > > > c > > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 15:18 -0400, Chad Cannell wrote: >> We currently have a Resin cluster of 25 nodes, configured to use JDBC >> persistence. We typically have around 140,000 active sessions. >> >> I am considering moving to cluster store persistence. We have been >> running on a single MySQL database. I have started to look into >> clustring it and thoght maybe cluster store would be better. >> >> Our app doesn't use the session for anything other than login state >> and >> the cluster simply provides SSO and LB. >> >> How would I go about determining what memory consumption our sessions >> would add to each node's JVM? Is there any documentation that would >> show >> how much memory 1 session would take in it's basic form? I could then >> extrapilate that out to our load. >> >> Any perf gain/loss by going to cluster store? >> >> My goal is better HA of session data and no performance degradation. >> >> -3 >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> resin-interest mailing list >> resin-interest@caucho.com >> http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > resin-interest mailing list > resin-interest@caucho.com > http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest _______________________________________________ resin-interest mailing list resin-interest@caucho.com http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
