On Mar 17, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Chad Cannell wrote:
> What is the difference between tcp-store and cluster-store?
They're the same. cluster-store is the newer name. tcp-store is just
for backward compatibility.
If you turn on "finer" logging, you should see the size of the session
> On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 15:18 -0400, Chad Cannell wrote:
>> We currently have a Resin cluster of 25 nodes, configured to use JDBC
>> persistence. We typically have around 140,000 active sessions.
>> I am considering moving to cluster store persistence. We have been
>> running on a single MySQL database. I have started to look into
>> clustring it and thoght maybe cluster store would be better.
>> Our app doesn't use the session for anything other than login state
>> the cluster simply provides SSO and LB.
>> How would I go about determining what memory consumption our sessions
>> would add to each node's JVM? Is there any documentation that would
>> how much memory 1 session would take in it's basic form? I could then
>> extrapilate that out to our load.
>> Any perf gain/loss by going to cluster store?
>> My goal is better HA of session data and no performance degradation.
>> resin-interest mailing list
> resin-interest mailing list
resin-interest mailing list