Scott Ferguson wrote: > On Jan 25, 2009, at 7:01 AM, Stargazer wrote: > > >> Which would you use for best Quercus performance? If bugs are fixed in >> Quercus, and applied to the 3.2.x line, are they to be fixed in future >> 3.1.x stable releases? >> > > Ok so theres a dilemma here. We know 4.0 won't be stable until at least the summer, but you don't advise anyone to use anything other than stable in production environments. It seems a waste to see all these Quercus fixes but never really be able to use them for 6 months. Couldn't you consider one last stable 3.2.x release, with these latest Quercus fixes, just for this reason? > For Quercus, you really need to use the latest version, because the > number of bug fixes and new functions is so large. > > -- Scott > > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> resin-interest mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > resin-interest mailing list > [email protected] > http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.13/1914 - Release Date: 24/01/2009 > 20:40 > >
_______________________________________________ resin-interest mailing list [email protected] http://maillist.caucho.com/mailman/listinfo/resin-interest
