Well, good to know. I'll stick to our current solution until we can  
move to the 4.X branch.

Thanks for the info.

S'està citant Scott Ferguson <f...@caucho.com>:

> Daniel López wrote:
>> Hi Scott,
>> I'm still using 3.1.*, is JMS in those versions production ready?
>> Documentation is a bit scarce so I'm not sure what to think of it. :)
> Because the 4.0 version is an entire rewrite (to match our new
> clustering model), I think we'd rather have new Resin JMS users on the
> 4.0 and not the 3.1 branch. If you're on the 3.1 branch and evaluating
> it, you might look at a different solution because it would be more
> difficult to support 3.1 JMS (and any bugs/suggestions wouldn't help 4.0.)
> -- Scott


resin-interest mailing list

Reply via email to