Hi-

 

Anyone have any thoughts on this?

 

Thanks,

Sandeep.

 

From: Sandeep Tikoo 
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2012 2:39 PM
To: resteasy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Client "Browser" Cache Question

 

Hi,

 

I have a question about Client Browser Cache. The cached response in
LightWeightBrowser is the marshalled response - which makes sense
because that is in keeping with the HTTP specification. This means that
even when there is a cache hit there is the overhead of unmarshalling
the response into the JAXB Entity. In our case this is typically 2-3 ms
in production environment, this is not big in itself except we can
potentially have 30-40 cache hits corresponding to a single end user
page request adding an overhead of up to 100ms. My question is:

 

*         Is it feasible to have a Client Cache implementation that
stores the marshalled entity instead? I am sure it is possible but do we
see any issues to having such a cache?

*         Does any such implementation already exist (and I wasn't able
to find it in the documentation)?

 

regards,

Sandeep.

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sfd2d-msazure
_______________________________________________
Resteasy-users mailing list
Resteasy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/resteasy-users

Reply via email to