Comment by jonathan...@gmail.com:

In the pre-commit use case, I'd like to be able to use ReviewBoard to commit the change to SVN for me. That closes the loop of: "Whoops, the developer accidentally committed something that they shouldn't have"
i.e. what was reviewed is actually what is committed.

Also, if the developer has code they want to commit, they have to include it in the review request. No chance of "well, you don't need to review my test case". The reviewer gets visibility of everything.

For more information:
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/IdeasFor2_0

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.

Reply via email to