Comment #2 on issue 2801 by eyuw...@gmail.com: Subversion reviews being treated as Perforce reviews?
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2801

RBTools 0.4.2
Python 2.6.1 (r261:67515, Jul 22 2010, 20:06:52)
[GCC 4.1.1]
Running on Linux-2.6.18-274.7.1.el5-x86_64-with-redhat-5.7-Final
Home = /home/user
Current Directory = /home/user/svn/app
Checking the repository type. Errors shown below are mostly harmless.
[2012-11-15 12:31:12] DEBUG: Checking for a CVS repository...
[2012-11-15 12:31:12] DEBUG: Checking for a ClearCase repository...
[2012-11-15 12:31:12] DEBUG: Checking for a Git repository...
[2012-11-15 12:31:12] DEBUG: Running: git rev-parse --git-dir
[2012-11-15 12:31:12] DEBUG: Command exited with rc 128: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--git-dir']
fatal: Not a git repository (or any parent up to mount parent )
Stopping at filesystem boundary (GIT_DISCOVERY_ACROSS_FILESYSTEM not set).
---
[2012-11-15 12:31:12] DEBUG: Checking for a Mercurial repository...
[2012-11-15 12:31:12] DEBUG: Checking for a Perforce repository...
[2012-11-15 12:31:12] DEBUG: Running: p4 info
[2012-11-15 12:31:14] DEBUG: Running: diff --version
[2012-11-15 12:31:14] DEBUG: repository info: Path: perforce....com:1666, Base path: None, Supports changesets: True
Finished checking the repository type.
[2012-11-15 12:31:14] DEBUG: Running: p4 counters
HTTP GETting api/
HTTP GETting https://reviewboard....com/api/info/
Using the new web API
[2012-11-15 12:31:15] INFO: Generating diff for changenum default
[2012-11-15 12:31:15] DEBUG: Running: p4 opened -c default
Couldn't find any affected files for this change.


Looks like it should continue with SVN after it failed to try p4 rather than stop

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard-issues" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard-issues@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard-issues+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard-issues?hl=en.

Reply via email to