it turned out the file I was diffing was on the server and not on the
clients pc.


On Sep 25, 9:38 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thought I had read something that indicated svn, but I don't know what that
> would have been now.
>
> What was the solution?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> VMware, Inc.
>
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 7:21 AM, 13Strider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I got it working thanks a lot every one.
>
> > On Sep 25, 9:39 am, 13Strider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > //N/Branches/Release/packages/live/n/n-main/prints.cpp
> > > This File is on the perforce.. so i dont understand what you mean?
>
> > > On Sep 24, 9:23 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > It doesn't look like the base diff path was calculated correctly. Look
> > at
> > > > the paths it's attempting to use, with the double "/". Other than the
> > double
> > > > "/", is the path correct, or should it have been /trunk/whatever or
> > > > something?
>
> > > > Christian
>
> > > > --
> > > > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > VMware, Inc.
>
> > > > On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 9:54 AM, 13Strider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> > > > > After i run post-review and go to Diff View i get this error any
> > idea?
>
> > > > > The patch to '//N/Branches/Release/packages/live/n/n-main/prints.cpp'
> > > > > didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left in '/tmp/
> > > > > reviewboard.VtGyQB' for debugging purposes. `patch` returned:
> > patching
> > > > > file /tmp/reviewboard.VtGyQB/tmpwXaBSh Reversed (or previously
> > > > > applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] Apply anyway? [n] Skipping
> > > > > patch. 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file /tmp/
> > > > > reviewboard.VtGyQB/tmpwXaBSh-new.rej
>
> > > > > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > > > >  File "/var/www/reviewboard/diffviewer/views.py", line 86, in
> > > > > view_diff
> > > > >    files = get_diff_files(diffset, None, interdiffset, highlighting)
> > > > >  File "/var/www/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py", line 651, in
> > > > > get_diff_files
> > > > >    enable_syntax_highlighting)
> > > > >  File "/var/www/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py", line 567, in
> > > > > generate_files
> > > > >    lambda: get_chunks(filediff.diffset,
> > > > >  File "/var/www/reviewboard/djblets/util/misc.py", line 55, in
> > > > > cache_memoize
> > > > >    data = lookup_callable()
> > > > >  File "/var/www/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py", line 570, in
> > > > > <lambda>
> > > > >    enable_syntax_highlighting))
> > > > >  File "/var/www/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py", line 338, in
> > > > > get_chunks
> > > > >    new = get_patched_file(old, filediff)
> > > > >  File "/var/www/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py", line 254, in
> > > > > get_patched_file
> > > > >    return patch(filediff.diff, buffer, filediff.dest_file)
> > > > >  File "/var/www/reviewboard/diffviewer/diffutils.py", line 125, in
> > > > > patch
> > > > >    (filename, tempdir, patch_output))
> > > > > Exception: The patch to '//N/Branches/Release/packages/live/n/n/
> > > > > prints.cpp' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary files have been left
> > > > > in '/tmp/reviewboard.VtGyQB' for debugging purposes.
> > > > > `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.VtGyQB/tmpwXaBSh
> > > > > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n]
> > > > > Apply anyway? [n]
> > > > > Skipping patch.
> > > > > 1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file /tmp/
> > > > > reviewboard.VtGyQB/tmpwXaBSh-new.rej
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to