I supplied it - no luck. I am little confused, though, How is this supposed to be a mask? It seems to me that it is only supposed to be the DN for a user that can do lookups:
cn=proxyagent,ou=profile,dc=corp,dc=domain,dc=tld Is this not the case? Brian On Nov 3, 5:51 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The empty anonymous fields may be the problem. Looking at the code, it looks > like they're very much needed. > > They're basically used to be able to look up the user's info when doing a > query for a User object, and the authentication code calls into this as > well. So once you supply the anonymous fields, I imagine things would start > working. > > Christian > > -- > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > VMware, Inc. > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Brian Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There isn't much to it, but I have reviewed it pretty carefully: > > > uid=%s,ou=People,dc=corp,dc=domain,dc=tld > > > I also tried with cn (which would be the same), in case it has to be a > > DN: > > > cn=%s,ou=People,dc=corp,dc=domain,dc=tld > > > And the host spec is: > > > ldap://10.20.30.40:389 > > > I left the anon fields empty. > > > Brian > > > On Nov 3, 5:17 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So, the one LDAP exception handler I didn't add logging to was the > > > "INVALID_CREDENTIALS" handler. This is thrown if the user's > > login/password > > > are invalid, *or* if the user mask string isn't correct. I'd imagine it's > > > probably the latter. Sure there's no typos or anything? > > > > Christian > > > > -- > > > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > VMware, Inc. > > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Brian Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I checked out the latest reviewboard and enabled logging. I see the > > > > log, but it contains very little detail - only INFO lines and nothing > > > > related to my failed LDAP logins. Is there some way to increase the > > > > verbosity that I missed? > > > > > 2008-11-03 17:10:43,002 - INFO - Logging to /tmp/reviewboard.log with > > > > a minimum level of DEBUG > > > > 2008-11-03 17:10:43,002 - INFO - Log file for Review Board v0.9 > > > > 2008-11-03 17:10:43,649 - INFO - Logging to /tmp/reviewboard.log with > > > > a minimum level of DEBUG > > > > 2008-11-03 17:10:43,649 - INFO - Log file for Review Board v0.9 > > > > ... > > > > > Brian > > > > > On Oct 30, 11:03 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Okay, these are in. Hopefully it will tell you what's going wrong, or > > at > > > > > least give you some error message you can use as a basis in your > > > > diagnosis. > > > > > Let me know. > > > > > > Christian > > > > > > -- > > > > > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > VMware, Inc. > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Christian Hammond < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > I don't know how your python knowledge is, but it might be useful > > to > > > > open > > > > > > up accounts/backends.py and do some logging in the error handlers, > > find > > > > out > > > > > > what it is that's failing. > > > > > > > I'll try to get some logging in for the error cases later today. > > > > > > > Christian > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > VMware, Inc. > > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 4:33 PM, Brian Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > >> 1) If I repeatedly clear the browser cache (Firefix 3.0.3 / > > Windows & > > > > > >> IE 7), the settings appear as the defaults, but it is seems pretty > > > > > >> clear that caching is causing a lot of this. > > > > > > >> 2) In any case, I cannot get an LDAP users to authenticate. I > > clearly > > > > > >> see the LDAP traffic generated by reviewboard (with tcpdump), but > > > > > >> that's the extent of any success with the settings. > > > > > > >> Thanks for puting the effort into this... > > > > > > >> Brian > > > > > > >> On Oct 30, 3:57 pm, "Christian Hammond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > Okay, so the wrong settings are showing up after hitting Save, > > but > > > > if > > > > > >> you > > > > > >> > navigate back to that page what do you see? What about after > > > > restarting > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> > server? > > > > > > >> > LDAP users don't need an existing account on Review Board. > > Assuming > > > > the > > > > > >> LDAP > > > > > >> > configuration is correct, the LDAP backend should Just Work, > > > > creating > > > > > >> users > > > > > >> > in the database when a user successfully logs in the first time, > > and > > > > > >> > validating their password against the LDAP server on each login. > > > > > > >> > I think I may know the reason behind the settings not appearing > > to > > > > be > > > > > >> saved. > > > > > >> > I'll need to do some work into investigating why this is > > happening. > > > > > >> However, > > > > > >> > if LDAP is actually set in the SiteConfiguration settings list > > and > > > > all > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> > values are correct, then we're looking at something different > > there. > > > > > > >> > I'll work to add some logging to the LDAP module and see if we > > can > > > > > >> narrow it > > > > > >> > down. > > > > > > >> > Christian > > > > > > >> > -- > > > > > >> > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >> > VMware, Inc. > > > > > > >> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Brian Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > Actually, I see the settings in the > > siteconfig_siteconfiguration > > > > table > > > > > >> > > now, but it isn't clear to me that they are being used, since > > I > > > > can't > > > > > >> > > seem to get any LDAP users to successfully login. How do I get > > > > > >> > > reviewboard to actually use LDAP to look a user's password? > > Does > > > > that > > > > > >> > > user have to be added to reviewboard first or will reviewboard > > now > > > > > >> > > allow anyone to login who has an LDAP entry? > > > > > > >> > > It is a little confusing that the defaults come back into the > > form > > > > > >> > > after clicking 'save', though. > > > > > > >> > > Brian > > > > > >> > > On Oct 30, 3:41 pm, Brian Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> > > > It still doesn't work. I _do_ get the "settings saved" geen > > > > check > > > > > >> mark > > > > > >> > > > now, but the default settings come back. It seems worse now, > > > > because > > > > > >> > > > now none of the settings actually save. Before the email > > > > settings > > > > > >> did > > > > > >> > > > save. > > > > > > >> > > > Brian > > > > > > >> > > > On Oct 30, 3:15 pm, "Christian Hammond" < > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > Everyone, go ahead and update. See if it works better now. > > > > There > > > > > >> was a > > > > > >> > > newly > > > > > >> > > > > introduced bug preventing settings from being saved. > > > > > > >> > > > > If you're still encountering the problem, I have some > > > > debugging > > > > > >> I'll > > > > > >> > > commit > > > > > >> > > > > that might help track this down. > > > > > > >> > > > > Really sorry for the inconvenience :/ > > > > > > >> > > > > Christian > > > > > > >> > > > > -- > > > > > >> > > > > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >> > > > > VMware, Inc. > > > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Christian Hammond < > > > > > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > Okay, I have something I'm looking into that may be the > > > > cause. > > > > > > >> > > > > > Can you go onto, say, the Diff Viewer form and see if > > > > settings > > > > > >> save > > > > > >> > > > > > properly there? > > > > > > >> > > > > > Christian > > > > > > >> > > > > > -- > > > > > >> > > > > > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >> > > > > > VMware, Inc. > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Brian Hill < > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > >> 1) I change to LDAP, fill in the values, click save, > > and > > > > > >> immediately > > > > > >> > > > > >> restart apache. > > > > > >> > > > > >> I then click on General and the default values appear. > > > > > > >> > > > > >> 2) mod_python-3.2.8-3.1(bundled with CentOS 5.2 x86_64 > > w/ > > > > most > > > > > >> > > recent > > > > > >> > > > > >> rpm updates) > > > > > > >> > > > > >> 3) mysql-5.0.45-7.el5 (bundled with CentOS 5.2 x86_64 > > w/ > > > > most > > > > > >> recent > > > > > >> > > > > >> rpm updates) > > > > > > >> > > > > >> On Oct 30, 2:27 pm, "Christian Hammond" < > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > >> > It's troublesome that people are all seeing this > > > > problem... > > > > > >> For > > > > > >> > > each > > > > > >> > > > > >> person > > > > > >> > > > > >> > who hit this, please answer the following: > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > * If you set the setting and then restart Apache, do > > you > > > > see > > > > > >> the > > > > > >> > > proper > > > > > >> > > > > >> > setting? > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > * Are you using mod_python or something else? > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > * What database are you using? > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > Christian > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > -- > > > > > >> > > > > >> > Christian Hammond - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > >> > > > > >> > VMware, Inc. > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 2:24 PM, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]< > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > I've noticed that I'm unable to save any edits to > > the > > > > > >> General > > > > > >> > > Settings > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > page, for instance setting the Administrator user > > name > > > > will > > > > > >> not > > > > > >> > > save > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > either. > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > --Jennifer > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > On Oct 30, 2:14 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" < > > > > > >> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > I'm having the same issue, the settings are not > > > > saved. Is > > > > > >> > > there any > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > workaround or values that I can configure > > directly in > > > > the > > > > > >> > > database? > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > Thanks! > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > --Jennifer > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Oct 29, 8:32 pm, Brian Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > I am still having the same problem Kevin did. I > > > > tried > > > > > >> it in > > > > > >> > > IE and > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Firefox same result. You don't get the green > > > > 'saved' > > ... > > read more » --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
