Hello again!

On Thursday 29 January 2009 05:03:05 Alexey Morozov wrote:
> Certainly the change is rather trivial but since I'm almost unfamiliar with
> LDAP-related things I'd like to hear first that there're no other
> considerations not to add the binding.

Also in http://www.mechanicalcat.net/tech/roundup/wiki/LDAPLogin I noticed 
that they use ldap.SCOPE_SUBTREE instead of ldap.SCOPE_ONELEVEL
when performing search-before-bind. This [potentially] could allow a more 
flexible LDAP trees (and I've found already this is useful on some LDAP 
configurations) but since I don't completely understand all consequences, I'd 
like to ask if it's worth doing.

Yours respectfully,
Alexey Morozov

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To post to this group, send email to reviewboard@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to