Hi, We're looking at a few code review tools for work, and I'm excited by what I see in Review Board.
I'm trying to wrap my head around the best way to associate a review with the correct file changes. We use Subversion and we usually do regular commits while working on a ticket (we use Trac) in order to not lose any local changes (e.g., drive failure, etc.). So I think (?) that rules us out of using the post-review model which relies on creating the review from all the uncommitted local changes for a ticket. The pre-review model (i.e., posting a diff of all the relevant code changes) seems like it might work, but the process of gathering up all the revisions for a ticket seems error prone. A ticket could have anywhere from 1 to 50 (or more) commits for it. Although each commit in our system is loosely tied to a ticket via the inclusion of a ticket number in the revision comment, how could we systematically pull in all of these revisions into one nice diff? I'm very curious to hear how other users have successfully integrated their code development/review with Review Board. I'm sure I'm missing the boat on some of this here. Thanks for reading, Eric P. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---