Hi, I was just working on configuring some default reviewers for the different branches of the Source tree.
One think that i noticed is that even though we set a default reviewer for a particular branch, if the person who posts the review has the option to delete these default reviewers before publishing it. Is there any way of making these reviewers mandatory for publishing the review? Actually, I would think that this should be the default behaviour as the admin has configured some default reviewer for a part of the source code and i think any code-change under that source-tree should be informed to the persons in charge of that branch. The users should not be allowed to override the configurations set by the admin. That would make no sense right? Thanks, Roshan Pius -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
