I was just working on configuring some default reviewers for the different
branches of the Source tree.
One think that i noticed is that even though we set a default reviewer for a
particular branch, if the person who posts the review has the option to
delete these default reviewers before publishing it. Is there any way of
making these reviewers mandatory for publishing the review?
Actually, I would think that this should be the default behaviour as the
admin has configured some default reviewer for a part of the source code and
i think any code-change under that source-tree should be informed to the
persons in charge of that branch. The users should not be allowed to
override the configurations set by the admin. That would make no sense
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at