Hi, Discard should only be used when that particular change has been abandoned. For example, if it's been decided that the feature or fix isn't needed, or something.
There's no way to "clear" the dashboard like this. The dashboard isn't really intended to be like gmail or anything, where the person viewing it has full control of what's on there. The best solution I can give right now is to use the "My Comments" and "New Updates" columns to better see which review requests you've commented on and which ones have changed since you last looked at it. Perhaps down the road the dashboard can be modified to be more configurable and allow you to hide review requests until there's a new update. That's a lot of work and won't be happening in the near future, though. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Jan Koprowski <jan.koprow...@gmail.com>wrote: > Hi! > > Is There a need to provide "mark as read" in ReviewBoard? > Reviewer from my company use ReviewBoard and they are very impressed > how easy and nice ReviewBoard is. He like dashboard. He asked me > something and I don't know how answer him. > He always want to have clear dashboard when him work is done. Only > way to do this is submit review when all is ok, or discard them when > something is wrong. But my feeling about discarding when 99% is ok but > only one line should be fixed is ... mixed. Is this a proper way? How > this will looks like. > > When developer want to make review they run post-review. > Reviewer read all changes, comment and find one small tiny > insignificant detail which should be change. Because they want to > "mark" this review request "as read" they discard it to make it > disappear from the dashboard. When the dashboard is clear they now > they can start do other things. > When developer fix this tiny insignificant detail run post-review with > --reopen (in progress) and --review-request-id and resurrect review > request. And so on. > > Is this good way? Or there is a "missing element" and "mark as read" > or "done for me" quasi-state should be provided? > > Greetings from Poland! > -- > Jan Koprowski > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en > > To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject. > -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
