There aren't any better ways to do it, since this is kind of contrary to the use cases we had when building RB. I personally like it when more than one person looks at a review--more eyes means more bugs are caught early on.
-David On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:57 AM, mnem <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > This is probably peculiar to the way we're using ReviewBoard here, but > I was wondering if anyone has a similar issues (and what their > solutions are). > > For our review process, new reviews target a group of reviewers, and > then the first free reviewer picks up the review and starts going > through it. The problem with this approach, however, is that it's > possible to accidentally have 2 people looking at the same review if > neither of them mention what review they are working on. > > Has anyone come up with a good solution for this? The main option that > comes to mind is that a reviewer claims a review by adding a comment > to the review and publishes it. > > Are there better ways to do it? > > > Dave > > -- > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at > http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
