There aren't any better ways to do it, since this is kind of contrary
to the use cases we had when building RB. I personally like it when
more than one person looks at a review--more eyes means more bugs are
caught early on.

-David



On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:57 AM, mnem <purple.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is probably peculiar to the way we're using ReviewBoard here, but
> I was wondering if anyone has a similar issues (and what their
> solutions are).
>
> For our review process, new reviews target a group of reviewers, and
> then the first free reviewer picks up the review and starts going
> through it. The problem with this approach, however, is that it's
> possible to accidentally have 2 people looking at the same review if
> neither of them mention what review they are working on.
>
> Has anyone come up with a good solution for this? The main option that
> comes to mind is that a reviewer claims a review by adding a comment
> to the review and publishes it.
>
> Are there better ways to do it?
>
>
> Dave
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Reply via email to