You're running exactly 1.5? Try upgrading. There are a lot of API issues in
1.5, which I want to rule out first.

Also, are you using mod_python, or something else?

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Vincent <tvinc...@astreya.com>wrote:

> I changed the site setting from http to https. Now I get:
> [13:07:36 tvincent@SERVER02:~/puppet]$ post-review -pd --
> summary="review board test" --description="REVIEW BOARD TEST"
> USE_SVN_README --username=tvincent
> >>> RBTools 0.3.2
> >>> Home = /home/tvincent
> >>> svn info
> >>> diff --version
> >>> repository info: Path: https://SERVER01.truncated.com/opt, Base path:
> /operations/puppet, Supports changesets: False
> >>> HTTP GETting api/
> ==> HTTP Authentication Required
> Enter authorization information for "Web API" at
> reviewboard.truncated.com
> Password:
> >>> HTTP GETting http://reviewboard.truncated.com/api/info/
> >>> Using the deprecated Review Board 1.0 web API
> >>> svn diff --diff-cmd=diff USE_SVN_README
> >>> svn info USE_SVN_README
> >>> svn info USE_SVN_README
> >>> svn info USE_SVN_README
> >>> svn info USE_SVN_README
> ==> Review Board Login Required
> Enter username and password for Review Board at
> http://reviewboard.truncated.com/
> Password:
> >>> Logging in with username "tvincent"
> >>> HTTP POSTing to
> http://reviewboard.truncated.com/api/json/accounts/login/: {'username':
> 'tvincent', 'password': '**************'}
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>  File "/usr/bin/post-review", line 7, in ?
>    sys.exit(
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
> rbtools/postreview.py", line 3790, in main
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
> rbtools/postreview.py", line 488, in login
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
> rbtools/postreview.py", line 982, in api_post
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
> rbtools/postreview.py", line 903, in http_post
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 130, in urlopen
>    return _opener.open(url, data)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 364, in open
>    response = meth(req, response)
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
> rbtools/postreview.py", line 317, in http_response
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 396, in error
>    result = self._call_chain(*args)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 337, in _call_chain
>    result = func(*args)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 741, in http_error_401
>    host, req, headers)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 720, in
> http_error_auth_reqed
>    return self.retry_http_basic_auth(host, req, realm)
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
> rbtools/postreview.py", line 339, in retry_http_basic_auth
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 730, in
> retry_http_basic_auth
>    return self.parent.open(req)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 364, in open
>    response = meth(req, response)
>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
> rbtools/postreview.py", line 317, in http_response
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 396, in error
>    result = self._call_chain(*args)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 337, in _call_chain
>    result = func(*args)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 916, in http_error_401
>    host, req, headers)
>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 807, in
> http_error_auth_reqed
>    raise ValueError("AbstractDigestAuthHandler doesn't know "
> ValueError: AbstractDigestAuthHandler doesn't know about Basic
>
>
> On May 10, 6:22 pm, Christian Hammond <chip...@chipx86.com> wrote:
> > What type of repository are you using? I assume Subversion?
> >
> > It looks like there are two things going wrong. The first is that Review
> > Board's having some sort of trouble fetching server information from your
> > repository. The second is that locally, it's been unable to generate a
> diff.
> >
> > So assuming Subversion, what happens if you run "svn diff" on your
> checkout?
> >
> > Christian
> >
> > --
> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
> >
> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Vincent <tvinc...@astreya.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I am getting the following errors when I try to upload a file using
> > > post-review.
> > > >>> Got API Error 210 (HTTP code 200): There was an error fetching
> extended
> > > information for this repository.
> > > >>> Error data: {'deprecated': {'in_version': '1.5'}, 'stat': 'fail',
> > > 'err': {'msg': 'There was an error fetching extended information for
> this
> > > repository.', 'code': 210}}
> > > >>> HTTP GETting api/json/repositories/3/info/
> > > >>> Got API Error 210 (HTTP code 200): There was an error fetching
> extended
> > > information for this repository.
> > > >>> Error data: {'deprecated': {'in_version': '1.5'}, 'stat': 'fail',
> > > 'err': {'msg': 'There was an error fetching extended information for
> this
> > > repository.', 'code': 210}}
> > > >>> HTTP GETting api/json/repositories/4/info/
> > > >>> Attempting to create review request onhttps://repository/optionfor
> > > None
> > > >>> HTTP POSTing
> tohttp://truncated/option/api/json/reviewrequests/new/:
> > > {'repository_path': 'https://truncated.com/option'}
> > > >>> Review request created
> > > >>> Attempting to set field 'summary' to 'review board test' for review
> > > request '408'
> > > >>> HTTP POSTing to
> > >http://truncated/api/json/reviewrequests/408/draft/set/:{'summary':
> > > 'review board test'}
> > > >>> Attempting to set field 'description' to 'REVIEW BOARD TEST' for
> review
> > > request '408'
> > > >>> HTTP POSTing to
> > >http://truncated/api/json/reviewrequests/408/draft/set/:{'description':
> > > 'REVIEW BOARD TEST'}
> > > >>> Uploading diff, size: 421
> > > >>> HTTP POSTing to
> > >http://truncating/api/json/reviewrequests/408/diff/new/:{'basedir':
> > > '/operations/puppet'}
> > > >>> Got API Error 105 (HTTP code 200): One or more fields had errors
> > > >>> Error data: {'fields': {'path': ["Server sent unexpected return
> value
> > > (500 Internal Server Error) in response to OPTIONS request for '
> > >https://truncated/opt/operations/puppet/USE_SVN_README'"]}, 'stat':
> > > 'fail', 'err': {'msg': 'One or more fields had errors', 'code': 105},
> > > 'deprecated': {'in_version': '1.5'}}
> >
> > > Error uploading diff
> >
> > > The generated diff file was empty. This usually means no files were
> > > modified in this change.
> >
> > > Try running with --output-diff and --debug for more information.
> >
> > > Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.
> >
> > > RB is 1.5, and rbtools are 0.3.2 .
> >
> > > --
> > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> > >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Reply via email to