It still looks like Review Board is having a problem accessing your
Subversion repository. It's failing in some way. Might want to check the
Review Board log file to see if anything is coming up, and attempt a 'svn
info' on the repository path from the Review Board server.

It could be some issue with your PySVN install, too.

Christian

-- 
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com


On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Thomas Vincent <tvinc...@astreya.com>wrote:

> Hi,
> I upgraded to version 1.5.5 and I am running mod_python with Python 2.6.
> Only asks me for my password once now.
>
> Less errors, but still a error:
>
>  post-review -pd --summary="review board test" --description="REVIEW BOARD
> TEST" USE_SVN_README --username=tvincent
> >>> RBTools 0.3.2
> >>> Home = /home/tvincent
> >>> svn info
> >>> diff --version
> >>> repository info: Path: https://SERVER01.truncated.com/opt, Base path:
> /operations/puppet, Supports changesets: False
> >>> HTTP GETting api/
> ==> HTTP Authentication Required
> Enter authorization information for "Web API" at SERVER02.truncated.com
> Password:
> >>> HTTP GETting http://SERVER02.truncated.com/api/info/
> >>> Using the new web API
>
> >>> svn diff --diff-cmd=diff USE_SVN_README
> >>> svn info USE_SVN_README
> >>> svn info USE_SVN_README
> >>> svn info USE_SVN_README
> >>> svn info USE_SVN_README
> >>> HTTP GETting http://SERVER02.truncated.com/api/repositories/
> >>> HTTP GETting http://SERVER02.truncated.com/api/repositories/2/
> >>> HTTP GETting http://SERVER02.truncated.com/api/repositories/2/info/
>
> >>> Got API Error 210 (HTTP code 500): There was an error fetching extended
> information for this repository
>  >>> Error data: {'stat': 'fail', 'err': {'msg': 'There was an error
> fetching extended information for this repository', 'code': 210}}
> >>> HTTP GETting http://SERVER02.truncated.com/api/repositories/3/
> >>> HTTP GETting http://SERVER02.truncated.com/api/repositories/3/info/
>
> >>> Got API Error 210 (HTTP code 500): There was an error fetching extended
> information for this repository
>  >>> Error data: {'stat': 'fail', 'err': {'msg': 'There was an error
> fetching extended information for this repository', 'code': 210}}
> >>> HTTP GETting http://SERVER02.truncated.com/api/repositories/4/
> >>> HTTP GETting http://SERVER02.truncated.com/api/repositories/4/info/
> >>> Attempting to create review request on
> https://SERVER01.truncated.com/opt for None
> >>> HTTP POSTing to http://SERVER02.truncated.com/api/review-requests/:
> {'repository': 'https://SERVER01.truncated.com/opt'}
> >>> Review request created
> >>> Attempting to set field 'summary' to 'review board test' for review
> request '414'
> >>> HTTP PUTting to
> http://SERVER02.truncated.com/api/review-requests/414/draft/: {'summary':
> 'review board test'}
> >>> Attempting to set field 'description' to 'REVIEW BOARD TEST' for review
> request '414'
> >>> HTTP PUTting to
> http://SERVER02.truncated.com/api/review-requests/414/draft/:
> {'description': 'REVIEW BOARD TEST'}
> >>> Uploading diff, size: 421
> >>> HTTP POSTing to
> http://SERVER02.truncated.com/api/review-requests/414/diffs/: {'basedir':
> '/operations/puppet'}
>
> >>> Got API Error 105 (HTTP code 400): One or more fields had errors
> >>> Error data: {'fields': {'path': ["Server sent unexpected return value
> (500 Internal Server Error) in response to OPTIONS request for '
> https://SERVER01.truncated.com/opt/operations/puppet/USE_SVN_README'"]},
> 'stat': 'fail', 'err': {'msg': 'One or more fields had errors', 'code':
> 105}}
>
>
> Error uploading diff
>
> The generated diff file was empty. This usually means no files were
> modified in this change.
>
> Try running with --output-diff and --debug for more information.
>
> Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.
>
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Christian Hammond 
> <chip...@chipx86.com>wrote:
>
>> You're running exactly 1.5? Try upgrading. There are a lot of API issues
>> in 1.5, which I want to rule out first.
>>
>> Also, are you using mod_python, or something else?
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Thomas Vincent <tvinc...@astreya.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I changed the site setting from http to https. Now I get:
>>> [13:07:36 tvincent@SERVER02:~/puppet]$ post-review -pd --
>>> summary="review board test" --description="REVIEW BOARD TEST"
>>> USE_SVN_README --username=tvincent
>>> >>> RBTools 0.3.2
>>> >>> Home = /home/tvincent
>>> >>> svn info
>>> >>> diff --version
>>> >>> repository info: Path: https://SERVER01.truncated.com/opt, Base
>>> path: /operations/puppet, Supports changesets: False
>>> >>> HTTP GETting api/
>>> ==> HTTP Authentication Required
>>> Enter authorization information for "Web API" at
>>> reviewboard.truncated.com
>>> Password:
>>> >>> HTTP GETting http://reviewboard.truncated.com/api/info/
>>> >>> Using the deprecated Review Board 1.0 web API
>>> >>> svn diff --diff-cmd=diff USE_SVN_README
>>> >>> svn info USE_SVN_README
>>> >>> svn info USE_SVN_README
>>> >>> svn info USE_SVN_README
>>> >>> svn info USE_SVN_README
>>> ==> Review Board Login Required
>>> Enter username and password for Review Board at
>>> http://reviewboard.truncated.com/
>>> Password:
>>> >>> Logging in with username "tvincent"
>>> >>> HTTP POSTing to
>>> http://reviewboard.truncated.com/api/json/accounts/login/: {'username':
>>> 'tvincent', 'password': '**************'}
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>  File "/usr/bin/post-review", line 7, in ?
>>>    sys.exit(
>>>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
>>> rbtools/postreview.py", line 3790, in main
>>>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
>>> rbtools/postreview.py", line 488, in login
>>>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
>>> rbtools/postreview.py", line 982, in api_post
>>>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
>>> rbtools/postreview.py", line 903, in http_post
>>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 130, in urlopen
>>>    return _opener.open(url, data)
>>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 364, in open
>>>    response = meth(req, response)
>>>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
>>> rbtools/postreview.py", line 317, in http_response
>>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 396, in error
>>>    result = self._call_chain(*args)
>>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 337, in _call_chain
>>>    result = func(*args)
>>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 741, in http_error_401
>>>    host, req, headers)
>>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 720, in
>>> http_error_auth_reqed
>>>    return self.retry_http_basic_auth(host, req, realm)
>>>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
>>> rbtools/postreview.py", line 339, in retry_http_basic_auth
>>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 730, in
>>> retry_http_basic_auth
>>>    return self.parent.open(req)
>>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 364, in open
>>>    response = meth(req, response)
>>>  File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/RBTools-0.3.2-py2.4.egg/
>>> rbtools/postreview.py", line 317, in http_response
>>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 396, in error
>>>    result = self._call_chain(*args)
>>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 337, in _call_chain
>>>    result = func(*args)
>>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 916, in http_error_401
>>>    host, req, headers)
>>>  File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/urllib2.py", line 807, in
>>> http_error_auth_reqed
>>>    raise ValueError("AbstractDigestAuthHandler doesn't know "
>>> ValueError: AbstractDigestAuthHandler doesn't know about Basic
>>>
>>>
>>> On May 10, 6:22 pm, Christian Hammond <chip...@chipx86.com> wrote:
>>> > What type of repository are you using? I assume Subversion?
>>> >
>>> > It looks like there are two things going wrong. The first is that
>>> Review
>>> > Board's having some sort of trouble fetching server information from
>>> your
>>> > repository. The second is that locally, it's been unable to generate a
>>> diff.
>>> >
>>> > So assuming Subversion, what happens if you run "svn diff" on your
>>> checkout?
>>> >
>>> > Christian
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>>> > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Thomas Vincent <tvinc...@astreya.com
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > Hi,
>>> > > I am getting the following errors when I try to upload a file using
>>> > > post-review.
>>> > > >>> Got API Error 210 (HTTP code 200): There was an error fetching
>>> extended
>>> > > information for this repository.
>>> > > >>> Error data: {'deprecated': {'in_version': '1.5'}, 'stat': 'fail',
>>> > > 'err': {'msg': 'There was an error fetching extended information for
>>> this
>>> > > repository.', 'code': 210}}
>>> > > >>> HTTP GETting api/json/repositories/3/info/
>>> > > >>> Got API Error 210 (HTTP code 200): There was an error fetching
>>> extended
>>> > > information for this repository.
>>> > > >>> Error data: {'deprecated': {'in_version': '1.5'}, 'stat': 'fail',
>>> > > 'err': {'msg': 'There was an error fetching extended information for
>>> this
>>> > > repository.', 'code': 210}}
>>> > > >>> HTTP GETting api/json/repositories/4/info/
>>> > > >>> Attempting to create review request
>>> onhttps://repository/optionfor
>>> > > None
>>> > > >>> HTTP POSTing
>>> tohttp://truncated/option/api/json/reviewrequests/new/:
>>> > > {'repository_path': 'https://truncated.com/option'}
>>> > > >>> Review request created
>>> > > >>> Attempting to set field 'summary' to 'review board test' for
>>> review
>>> > > request '408'
>>> > > >>> HTTP POSTing to
>>> > >http://truncated/api/json/reviewrequests/408/draft/set/:{'summary':
>>> > > 'review board test'}
>>> > > >>> Attempting to set field 'description' to 'REVIEW BOARD TEST' for
>>> review
>>> > > request '408'
>>> > > >>> HTTP POSTing to
>>> > >http://truncated/api/json/reviewrequests/408/draft/set/:{'description
>>> ':
>>> > > 'REVIEW BOARD TEST'}
>>> > > >>> Uploading diff, size: 421
>>> > > >>> HTTP POSTing to
>>> > >http://truncating/api/json/reviewrequests/408/diff/new/:{'basedir':
>>> > > '/operations/puppet'}
>>> > > >>> Got API Error 105 (HTTP code 200): One or more fields had errors
>>> > > >>> Error data: {'fields': {'path': ["Server sent unexpected return
>>> value
>>> > > (500 Internal Server Error) in response to OPTIONS request for '
>>> > >https://truncated/opt/operations/puppet/USE_SVN_README'"]}, 'stat':
>>> > > 'fail', 'err': {'msg': 'One or more fields had errors', 'code': 105},
>>> > > 'deprecated': {'in_version': '1.5'}}
>>> >
>>> > > Error uploading diff
>>> >
>>> > > The generated diff file was empty. This usually means no files were
>>> > > modified in this change.
>>> >
>>> > > Try running with --output-diff and --debug for more information.
>>> >
>>> > > Your review request still exists, but the diff is not attached.
>>> >
>>> > > RB is 1.5, and rbtools are 0.3.2 .
>>> >
>>> > > --
>>> > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>>> > >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>> > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> > > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>>> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> > > For more options, visit this group at
>>> > >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>>
>>> --
>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>>
>>
>>  --
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>
>
>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Reply via email to