Hmm, Looking in the Site folder, there are sym-links to the new beta 2
so maybe there is some caching going on.
Would have thought restarting memcahced and lighttpd would have sorted
that.

On May 20, 8:36 pm, sr55 <sra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://reviews.handbrake.fr/dashboard/
>
> Seems it's still Beta 1. The bug on the user pages e.g. "https://
> reviews.handbrake.fr/users/davidfstr/" is still there which I believe
> you fixed.
>
> On May 20, 8:16 pm, Christian Hammond <chip...@chipx86.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > This is just the search index setting?
>
> > We don't update that. In fact, it shouldn't be pointing inside the
> > ReviewBoard directory at all. It looks like your upgrade was successful. I'd
> > just change the search index setting to point to some place inside your side
> > directory (in data/).
>
> > Christian
>
> > --
> > Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> > Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> > VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:12 PM, sr55 <sra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Trying to upgrade our reviewboard to beta 2. Problem is, the rb-site
> > > tool seems to be failing. I've done the following:
>
> > > /www/Reviews% sudo easy_install -f
> > >http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> > > -U 
> > > <http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/%0A-U>ReviewBoard
> > > Searching for ReviewBoard
> > > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.6/
> > > Readinghttp://pypi.python.org/simple/ReviewBoard/
> > > Readinghttp://www.review-board.org/
> > > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.0/
> > > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.5/
> > > Readinghttp://downloads.review-board.org/releases/
> > > Best match: ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1
> > > Processing ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-py2.5.egg
> > > ReviewBoard 1.6beta2.1 is already the active version in easy-
> > > install.pth
> > > Installing rb-site script to /usr/bin
> > > Installing rbssh script to /usr/bin
>
> > > Using /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.6beta2.1-
> > > py2.5.egg
> > > Readinghttp://downloads.reviewboard.org/mirror/
> > > Processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
> > > Finished processing dependencies for ReviewBoard
>
> > > -----------------------------------
>
> > > /www/Reviews% sudo rb-site upgrade .
> > > Rebuilding directory structure
> > > Updating database. This may take a while.
> > > No fixtures found.
> > > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pycrypto-2.3-py2.5-linux-i686.egg/
> > > Crypto/Util/randpool.py:40: RandomPool_DeprecationWarning: This
> > > application uses RandomPool, which is BROKEN in older releases.  See
> > >http://www.pycrypto.org/randpool-broken
> > >  RandomPool_DeprecationWarning)
> > > No evolution required.
> > > Upgrade complete.
>
> > > --------------------------------------
>
> > > /www/Reviews% rb-site manage . evolve -- --hint
> > > No evolution required.
>
> > > ----------------------------
>
> > > Restart Lightttpd, and the site still shows 1.6 Beta 1
>
> > > Running on Debian 5 with Python 2.5
>
> > > I noticed in the site configurations, it says beta 2, but in the
> > > Setting value it still shows "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/
> > > ReviewBoard-1.6beta1-py2.5.egg/reviewboard/search-index"
>
> > > --
> > > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> > >http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> > > Happy user? Let us know athttp://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Reply via email to