On Friday 15 July 2011 07:45:22 pm Chris Toomey wrote:
> Are there any plans / rough ETA to add mercurial support to post-
> review? We've been using
> http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ReviewboardExtension which is pretty good
> but doesn't support some of the features of post- review like passing in a
> diff file. Plus it'd be better in general for folks to be able to use
> post-review versus having to find external workarounds like that.
> I'm not sure what the reasons are for the developers creating that
> external extension versus updating post-review, was / is there any
> reason they don't want to update post-review?
I am using the RB mercurial extension as I am much more familiar with the
mercurial source code and that I currently don't need any extra features.
It also makes my users only use hg subcommands, wether this is for pure
mercurial or reviewboard, which kind simplify the training.
I was planning to contribute to RBTools at some point, but I never had the
time to allocate for that.
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at