On Friday 15 July 2011 07:45:22 pm Chris Toomey wrote: > Are there any plans / rough ETA to add mercurial support to post- > review? We've been using > http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ReviewboardExtension which is pretty good > but doesn't support some of the features of post- review like passing in a > diff file. Plus it'd be better in general for folks to be able to use > post-review versus having to find external workarounds like that. > > I'm not sure what the reasons are for the developers creating that > external extension versus updating post-review, was / is there any > reason they don't want to update post-review? > > thanks, > Chris
I am using the RB mercurial extension as I am much more familiar with the mercurial source code and that I currently don't need any extra features. It also makes my users only use hg subcommands, wether this is for pure mercurial or reviewboard, which kind simplify the training. I was planning to contribute to RBTools at some point, but I never had the time to allocate for that. Regards. Gilles. -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
