On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Stephen Gallagher <
> On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 11:59 -0700, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > Ugh. Bad wording. It means what you'd hope it would mean. We had an
> > unconditional usage of the modpython handler in Django, which could
> > break if no mod_python support existed on the system.
> Interesting... I'd installed several times with mod_wsgi installed and
> mod_python not, without issue. Good to know I won't have trouble in the
> future, though :)
Yeah, I know it hit some people but not everyone. I don't remember the exact
cause. But this fixes it! :)
> > We don't require Pygments 1.4 to run, but we do require it for
> > installing through setup.py. You can package it without it. However,
> > this is something I suspect we'll hit a lot more in the future.
> > While we work on 2.0, we'll likely put out many more 1.6 releases,
> > rather than work toward new 1.x releases. Some of these may bump up
> > our dependencies to work around bugs, improve performance, or
> > introduce new functionality we may require. I imagine that'll make
> > things more difficult for packaging.
> Well, I'm not too concerned about that. My EPEL packages will likely
> stay on version 1.5.x because we have requirements about not doing major
> version upgrades on a stable platform. I just needed to make sure I
> wasn't going to have trouble with Pygments 1.1.1 until I can get the
> RHEL maintainer to update it.
Yeah, it should be fine with 1.1.1, but they'll miss out on lots of bug
fixes and speed improvements. But it certainly shouldn't break.
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at