Within the company where I work, there have been murmurs of popularizing the Review Board instance my team is using. This is good and bad news. The good news is that people are looking harder at code review becoming a more formal part of how we work. The bad news is that I don't know anything about running Review Board at scale. The 1.0 release blog post states there was, at the time, a company with 83k+ reviews and 2k+ users. Assuming said company kept using Review Board, this number has likely increased drastically. I'm curious how this was accomplished. A single, massive, machine? Clustering?
I don't have a count of the number of commits over time that we'd should expect but the number of users is in the 1k-2k range for the next few quarters. The current Review Board machine specs are as follows: * CentOS 5.2 * Python 2.4.3 * 35G+ of available disk * Quad Xeon 2.27GHz * 16G RAM For the sake of argument, let's assume something in the ~100k commit range. Should I worry? -- --tucker -- Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
