The server name is svn and there is no path to the repo except /?
On Mar 15, 2012 4:39 PM, "Britt Pearsall" <doubl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Does anyone have any ideas to help with this problem?
>
> We've gotten a read-only user created, however I still cannot get Review
> Board to realize there is a repository at the given URL. It simply 'cannot
> connect to server https://svn' -- that is the proper root for our
> repository, and I've attempted to replace the 'svn' with the proper IP
> address, but still nothing works.
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Britt Pearsall <doubl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> We're using Review Board 1.6.3 -- it was the most up-to-date version as
>> of a few weeks ago. Since it's not up and running yet, I'll probably end up
>> upgrading before handing it over to my team.
>>
>> We access the Subversion server with HTTPS. We have no SSH access -- the
>> repository is controlled by an outside team and they have very strict
>> regulations regarding who they grant access to it. We do have a few
>> read-only users that we could use, so I'll attempt to set up RB using one
>> of them
>>
>> The server kicks back an error:
>>
>> [Tue Feb 28 06:39:11 2012] [error] ERROR:root:SVN: Failed to get
>> repository information for https://svn/<--->: OPTIONS of 'https://svn/<--->':
>> could not connect to server (https://svn)
>> [Tue Feb 28 06:39:13 2012] [error]
>> /usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Django-1.3.1-py2.6.egg/django/contrib/auth/models.py:393:
>> DeprecationWarning: The user messaging API is deprecated. Please update
>> your code to use the new messages framework.
>> [Tue Feb 28 06:39:13 2012] [error]   category=DeprecationWarning)
>>
>> Those two errors look unrelated to me, but I'll see what I can do about
>> updating the 'user messaging API' -- anyone know off the top of their head
>> what module that might be?
>>
>> ~Britt
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Christian Hammond 
>> <chip...@chipx86.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Britt,
>>>
>>> What version of Review Board are you using?
>>>
>>> What form of URL are you using for the Subversion server? Is it backed
>>> by SSH or by HTTPS? You may want to check your server log to see if there
>>> are any errors during repository checking.
>>>
>>> You can't have each user authenticate separately, nor would it make any
>>> sense to do so. Review Board is going to access the files, cache them, and
>>> present them to each user. The access is not per-user.
>>>
>>> What we generally recommend is to have a read-only account on the SVN
>>> side and use that. If you have any SSH access to the repository, you can
>>> use SSH keys and skip the password part entirely.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:01 AM, Britt Pearsall <doubl...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm trying to link ReviewBoard to a code repository, specifically a
>>>> Subversion repository. I have the URL that we use to get to the code, but I
>>>> think we have a proxy of some kind and that it might be blocking the site
>>>> from recognizing the repository.
>>>>
>>>> I believe the proxy is set up specifically for SVN and not the internet
>>>> as a whole, so I didn't think it qualified as the whole box behind 'behind
>>>> the proxy server' -- meaning I didn't set up the http-proxy variable before
>>>> running the easy_install. But even before installation both the server RB
>>>> is hosted on and the machine I'm accessing the site from had access to the
>>>> SVN repository -- both machines can browse/checkout/commit/etc code.
>>>> However when I try to add the repo from the admin dashboard I get an error
>>>> that that no repository exists at the specified path. Anyone have any 
>>>> ideas?
>>>>
>>>> An additional question for when I do get connected -- I can input a
>>>> username/pw on the admin console for the repository, however everyone here
>>>> has their own username/pw for SVN. Is there a way that they can each
>>>> connect to SVN, through reviewboard, with their own ID?
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>>
>>>
>>>  --
>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>
>>
>>
>  --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Reply via email to