thanks Christian for the answers. are you saying each svn command (svn 
info, svn diff, etc) set different permission access? 

thanks a lot,
Hans

On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 5:51:55 PM UTC+8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> post-review just runs 'svn info' and 'svn diff' and other commands from 
> the repository. So it's not really a matter of configuring post-review. 
> It's a matter of making sure your SVN checkout can run those commands 
> manually, without passing credentials on the command line. There's no 
> mechanism to pass SVN credentials through post-review.
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Hans Shi <hansn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> i guess this is a general case for svn auth, anybody encounter this too?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 4:51:08 PM UTC+8, Hans Shi wrote:
>>>
>>> then i change svn server with anonymous access enabled... the 
>>> post-review successfully conducted and reviewboard request is generated as 
>>> well. 
>>>
>>> our svn uses LDAP auth with Windows Domain users, so can i put auth 
>>> infor as parameters in post-review command? if yes, how? if not, any 
>>> alternative approaches to resolve this? 
>>>
>>> thanks a lot, 
>>> Hans
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 4:39:09 PM UTC+8, Hans Shi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> hi Christian, 
>>>>
>>>> No, it doesn't related by client cookie. Previous testing i made on dev 
>>>> svn server, to avoid interrupt dev's work, I setup another SVN server 
>>>> which 
>>>> is exact the same configuration as dev's real one. The issue still happen 
>>>> with the same phenomenon. 
>>>>
>>>> i revised the py code as below without indicate the*--repository-url=XXX
>>>> *: 
>>>>
>>>> log_cmd = 'D:/Python25/Scripts/post-**review.exe --debug 
>>>> --revision-range=19:20 --publish --username=ghost --password=ghost 
>>>> --submit-as=hans.shi --summary="hans.shi code submit at version #20" '
>>>>  log('post-review commmand: ' + log_cmd)
>>>>
>>>> fh=os.popen(log_cmd, 'r')
>>>>  for val in fh.readlines():
>>>> log('value:' + val.rstrip())
>>>>  log('post-review executed successfully!!! ')
>>>>
>>>> the log output as below which mean the post-review command is executed 
>>>> successfully: 
>>>>
>>>> post-review commmand: D:/Python25/Scripts/post-**review.exe --debug 
>>>> --revision-range=19:20 --publish --username=ghost --password=ghost 
>>>> --submit-as=hans.shi --summary="hans.shi code submit at version #20" 
>>>> value:>>> RBTools 0.4.1
>>>> value:>>> Home =
>>>> value:The current directory does not contain a checkout from a
>>>> value:supported source code repository.
>>>>
>>>> so i'm doubting the svn auth in post-review command.... more to come...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 3:39:16 PM UTC+8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Just speculating, but perhaps it's not finding your cookie file when 
>>>>> run through the hook, and is therefore prompting for input.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>>>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 12:31 AM, Hans Shi <hansn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> anybody else met this similar issue?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 3:57:53 PM UTC+8, Hans Shi wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Christian, 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks for the reply. there is no firewall between svn server and 
>>>>>>> reviewboard server, as you can see my login user afra.liu can execute 
>>>>>>> post-review command and generate reviewboard request successfully. 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> any other clues? 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks again, 
>>>>>>> Hans
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, July 3, 2012 3:04:51 PM UTC+8, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Hans,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you behind a firewall? If so, the proper settings may not be 
>>>>>>>> provided in the context of whatever is running the script.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
>>>>>>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>>>>>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Hans Shi <hansn...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi there, 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> May i have a question for ReviewBoard post-review invokved by 
>>>>>>>>> svn's post-commit.bat? 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> when i use python code to auto execute post-review command when 
>>>>>>>>> developer checks in a code, the svn window stucks there with no 
>>>>>>>>> response, 
>>>>>>>>> but eventually will prompt timeout error. 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/-19NDSZi03W4/T_KMdL1xcTI/AAAAAAAAFzI/ZnZBOu70Vtc/s1600/check-in+stuck.png>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From the svn server, post-review command is stuck there as well, 
>>>>>>>>> interestingly when i get the post-review command, and execute it in 
>>>>>>>>> dos 
>>>>>>>>> window, it works and can generate review request successfully. (the 
>>>>>>>>> difference is different executors, one is login user, one is SYSTEM 
>>>>>>>>> user)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-ZuAM5fTuquw/T_KOWsqNqVI/AAAAAAAAFzU/g9XnY9P3RE8/s1600/post-review+backend.png>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> who can help me out? i've struggled in reviewboard integration 
>>>>>>>>> into svn for a few weeks, SOS!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thank you very much in advance, 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hans
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>>>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>>>>>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**don**ate/<http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/>
>>>>>>>>> Happy user? Let us know at 
>>>>>>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**use**rs/<http://www.reviewboard.org/users/>
>>>>>>>>> -~----------~----~----~----~--****----~----~------~--~---
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>>>>> reviewboard+unsubscribe@**google**groups.com<reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>>>>>>>>> group**/reviewboard?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  -- 
>>>>>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>>>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**donate/<http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/>
>>>>>> Happy user? Let us know at 
>>>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**users/<http://www.reviewboard.org/users/>
>>>>>> -~----------~----~----~----~--**----~----~------~--~---
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>>>>> reviewboard+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<reviewboard%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>
>>>>>> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/**
>>>>>> group/reviewboard?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Reply via email to