Hi Christian,

can we install an older version of RB 1.6.11 & its dependencies using 
easy_install with net connectivity. if yes please let me know the proc for 
it.

Thanks.
Peer



On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 4:33:50 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> You can't. We require easy_install. You can download every dependency, and 
> easy_install them manually, but we don't provide any list of what you'd 
> need.
>
> We're dropping support for installing on Windows, as it tends to be a 
> support nightmare, isn't as efficient, and not all of our dependencies work 
> well on it. We'll require Linux going forward. If you're a Windows shop, 
> you can try installing in a Linux VM, or look into hosting at 
> http://rbcommons.com/
>
> Christian
>
> -- 
> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com <javascript:>
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Peer <peerm...@gmail.com <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>>
>> Also Christian pls let me know how to install RB in windows without 
>> easy-install / offline
>>
>> Thanks
>> Peer
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, October 16, 2012 1:18:24 PM UTC+5:30, Peer wrote:
>>>
>>> the above traceback err was for the diff uploaded wich was generated 
>>> manually by diff -uN,
>>> below trace back is for diff uploaded by post-review, and yes i use 
>>> dynamic views and the oid is ther for the file and starts with ====
>>>
>>> The file 'M:/reviews/sw0/triggers.txt@@**/main/2' (r\main\2) could not 
>>> be found in the repository
>>>
>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>   File "c:\python25\lib\site-**packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12-**
>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\**diffviewer\views.py", line 254, in view_diff
>>>     populate_diff_chunks(temp_**files, highlighting)
>>>   File "c:\python25\lib\site-**packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12-**
>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\**diffviewer\diffutils.py", line 1182, in 
>>> populate_diff_chunks
>>>     large_data=True)
>>>   File 
>>> "c:\python25\lib\site-**packages\Djblets-0.6.23-py2.5.**egg\djblets\util\misc.py",
>>>  
>>> line 156, in cache_memoize
>>>     data = lookup_callable()
>>>   File "c:\python25\lib\site-**packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12-**
>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\**diffviewer\diffutils.py", line 1181, in <lambda>
>>>     enable_syntax_highlighting)),
>>>   File "c:\python25\lib\site-**packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12-**
>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\**diffviewer\diffutils.py", line 588, in 
>>> get_chunks
>>>     old = get_original_file(filediff)
>>>   File "c:\python25\lib\site-**packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12-**
>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\**diffviewer\diffutils.py", line 368, in 
>>> get_original_file
>>>     large_data=True)[0]
>>>   File 
>>> "c:\python25\lib\site-**packages\Djblets-0.6.23-py2.5.**egg\djblets\util\misc.py",
>>>  
>>> line 156, in cache_memoize
>>>     data = lookup_callable()
>>>   File "c:\python25\lib\site-**packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12-**
>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\**diffviewer\diffutils.py", line 367, in <lambda>
>>>     data = cache_memoize(key, lambda: [fetch_file(file, revision)],
>>>   File "c:\python25\lib\site-**packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12-**
>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\**diffviewer\diffutils.py", line 347, in 
>>> fetch_file
>>>     data = repository.get_file(file, revision)
>>>   File "c:\python25\lib\site-**packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12-**
>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\**scmtools\models.py", line 155, in get_file
>>>     return self.get_scmtool().get_file(**path, revision)
>>>   File "c:\python25\lib\site-**packages\ReviewBoard-1.6.12-**
>>> py2.5.egg\reviewboard\**scmtools\clearcase.py", line 235, in get_file
>>>     raise FileNotFoundError(extended_**path, revision)
>>> FileNotFoundError: The file 'M:/reviews/sw0/triggers.txt@@**/main/2' 
>>> (r\main\2) could not be found in the repository
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Monday, October 15, 2012 10:06:29 PM UTC+5:30, Tomasz Moń wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Peer <peerm...@gmail.com> wrote: 
>>>> > i tried using uploading diff generated by diff -uN/diff -c (or) 
>>>> post-review 
>>>> > (submit diff of checked-out files), all of them diff get broken after 
>>>> some 
>>>> > time) 
>>>>
>>>> If you submitted patch using post-review, the extended_path should 
>>>> include version information (the fabulous '@@'). In your traceback it 
>>>> appears to be missing. 
>>>> In that case, for Dynamic Clear Case Views, it will try to apply the 
>>>> patch on current version of the file, so it breaks when both: 
>>>> a) file version changes (for example, review gets shipped) 
>>>> b) the old file version disappears from cache 
>>>>
>>>> When using postreview the patches should include oids, and then the 
>>>> ReviewBoard should output correct version and extended paths. You can 
>>>> check if your patches contain the oids, by downloading those and 
>>>> checking for lines starting/ending with four equal signs (====). 
>>>>
>>>  -- 
>> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
>> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
>>
>
>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Reply via email to