It's not an intentional decision, it's just not something that we've
had a need for in the past. It would be pretty trivial to add a new
resource for this, especially if you just need read-only (GET) access.

-David


On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Scott Quesnelle
<scott.quesne...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Just wanted to say thanks for the excellent tool. We have been using
> reviewboard for over 2 years now. One question though. We use default
> reviewers, and associate them with review groups. This helps reduce the
> administration as users can join/leave groups as they see fit.  We are using
> default reviewers and associate review groups on a per directory basis. Some
> users would like to know a way to determining what group owns a particular
> area of the tree.  I thought of using the REST api to get this data out, but
> I noticed the default reviewers isn't part of the REST api. Any particular
> reason that it isn't?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en

Reply via email to