Yeah, we can add that support, but the blessjs you're referring to is unrelated 
to the project. Our "bless" compiler service is really for lesscss.


On Nov 26, 2012, at 6:23, Stephen Gallagher <> wrote:

> On 11/20/2012 05:32 PM, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Yes, I'll be pushing out a 1.6.14 probably this week. We'll continue to
>> release 1.6.x releases for a little while after 1.7 is out.
>> I'm putting out an RC of 1.7 hopefully also this week.
> One thing I wanted to check with you on before the 1.7 release candidate gets 
> issued. Right now, we have an issue with building Review Board 1.7 in Fedora 
> and EPEL because it relies on web access to the blesscss website. The problem 
> here is that the Fedora build system disallows network access because all of 
> our builds have to be repeatable (i.e. I must be able to ensure that I bless 
> the CSS with exactly the same algorithm).
> Would it be at all possible for you to conditionalize the 
> djblet.pipeline.compilers.bless routine to use a local 'blessc' application 
> if it is present in the $PATH? This would be the best solution from our 
> perspective.
> I'm currently working on packaging blessjs for Fedora to this end.

Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
Happy user? Let us know at
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to