Awesome :)

We'll make sure to have our build infrastructure use local less before we ship 
RC (which will probably be tomorrow).

Christian


On Nov 26, 2012, at 12:22, Stephen Gallagher <step...@gallagherhome.com> wrote:

> On Mon 26 Nov 2012 02:40:24 PM EST, Christian Hammond wrote:
>> Should be less from http://lesscss.org/
>> 
>> I remember we talked before about the node.js challenges surrounding
>> that. Did you guys figure out a solution to that?
> 
> I took over the packaging of Node.js. It's currently awaiting approval[1] 
> (which I expect to get, since I actually managed to get upstream to accept my 
> patches to unbundle the libraries it was statically linking)
> 
> With that accepted, it should be fairly simple to get lesscss packaged 
> (especially since there's a review already pending for it.[2]) I'll be 
> reviewing that one, so it'll land fairly quickly.
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=815018
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=857843
> 
> -- 
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
> 
> 

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


Reply via email to