Turned Debug=True, now i see this  ... any pointers?

Traceback:
File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/core/handlers/base.py"
in get_response
  89.                     response = middleware_method(request)
File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/admin/middleware.py"
in process_request
  44.         load_site_config()
File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1-py2.6.egg/reviewboard/admin/siteconfig.py"
in load_site_config
  215.     apply_django_settings(siteconfig, settings_map)
File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/django_settings.py"
in apply_django_settings
  210.             setter(settings, setting_key, value)
File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/siteconfig/django_settings.py"
in _set_cache_backend
  48.         engine, host, params = parse_backend_uri(value)
File
"/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/core/cache/__init__.py"
in parse_backend_uri
  58.     if backend_uri.find(':') == -1:

Exception Type: AttributeError at /
Exception Value: 'dict' object has no attribute 'find'


On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 12:16 AM, Christian Hammond <chip...@gmail.com>wrote:

> We're definitely compatible with Python 2.6. All the entries in the log
> you provided are just harmless warnings, so it must be something else
> causing the HTTP 500 error. Is there nothing else after that in the log
> file?
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2012, at 5:56, Vishal Gautam <gautamvis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ahh ... that python upgrade caused a lot of damage (being a newbie), spent
> entire day battling it ... since it was a new install, I recreated the site
> with new db, got plethora of errors. Thinking Python 2.7 could be an issue
> I have now downgraded to Python 2.6 and re-installed RB 1.7 and recreated
> the site. Now i get a 500 with following errors in error_log. Is RB 1.7 not
> compatible with Python 2.6?
>
> [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]
> /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.6.egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__.py:26:
> DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
> [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   from md5 import md5
> [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]
> /usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Django-1.4.2-py2.6.egg/django/views/generic/list_detail.py:10:
> DeprecationWarning: Function-based generic views have been deprecated; use
> class-based views instead.
> [Fri Dec 07 13:39:43 2012] [error]   DeprecationWarning
>
>
> On Friday, December 7, 2012 12:13:16 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> First, do you have a backup of the database?
>>
>> What actions did you take on the database prior to this attempt? For
>> example, did you ever run evolve yourself? Or attempt a downgrade after an
>> upgrade?
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Vishal Gautam <gautam...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the response Chris!
>>>
>>> I upgrade CentOS to 5.8, manually installed Python 2.7, upgraded
>>> setuptools for 2.7, then upgraded RB to 1.7rc1. All this made it fine
>>> (after getting bunch of issues those I could look up in Google). Now I am
>>> stuck at upgrading the site .... and my RB instance is down ... Please help!
>>>
>>> [root@jira ~]# /usr/local/bin/rb-site upgrade /var/www/
>>> reviews.xxx.xxxx.com
>>> Rebuilding directory structure
>>> Updating database. This may take a while.
>>> /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-**packages/Djblets-0.7.5-py2.7.**
>>> egg/djblets/gravatars/__init__**.py:26: DeprecationWarning: the md5
>>> module is deprecated; use hashlib instead
>>>   from md5 import md5
>>> /usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-**packages/pycrypto-2.6-py2.7-**
>>> linux-x86_64.egg/Crypto/Util/**number.py:57: PowmInsecureWarning: Not
>>> using mpz_powm_sec.  You should rebuild using libgmp >= 5 to avoid timing
>>> attack vulnerability.
>>> Creating tables ...
>>> Project signature has changed - an evolution is required
>>> Installing custom SQL ...
>>> Installing indexes ...
>>> Installed 0 object(s) from 0 fixture(s)
>>> The stored evolutions do not completely resolve all model changes.
>>> Run `./manage.py evolve --hint` to see a suggestion for the changes
>>> required.
>>>
>>> The following are the changes that could not be resolved:
>>> In model reviews.FileAttachmentComment:
>>>     Field 'extra_data' has been added
>>> In model reviews.ReviewRequest:
>>>     Field 'last_review_activity_**timestamp' has been added
>>>     Field 'last_review_timestamp' has been deleted
>>> In model accounts.Profile:
>>>     Field 'timezone' has been added
>>>     Field 'open_an_issue' has been added
>>> In model diffviewer.DiffSetHistory:
>>>     Field 'last_diff_updated' has been added
>>> In model diffviewer.FileDiff:
>>>     Field 'diff_hash' has been added
>>>     Field 'parent_diff_hash' has been added
>>>     Field 'diff64' has been added
>>>     Field 'parent_diff64' has been added
>>>     Field 'parent_diff' has been deleted
>>>     Field 'diff' has been deleted
>>> The model auth.Message has been deleted
>>> Error: Your models contain changes that Django Evolution cannot resolve
>>> automatically.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:36:42 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Review Board 1.7 requires Python 2.5 or higher. You'll have to upgrade
>>>> in order for it to work.
>>>>
>>>> What I'd recommend is a newer CentOS install, since some of our
>>>> dependencies will also need to be updated, and you won't hit as many issues
>>>> with the upgrade. Your best bet is to upgrade to something with Python 2.7.
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Vishal Gautam <gautam...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> We are trying out RB, we have 1.6.14 installed and running on CentOS
>>>>> 5.5. Tried to upgrade it to 1.7 using following cmd but its failing  ...
>>>>>
>>>>>   easy_install -f http://downloads.reviewboard.**o**
>>>>> rg/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7<http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7>-U
>>>>>  ReviewBoard
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is the stracktrace, any help will be much appreciated
>>>>>
>>>>> Best match: ReviewBoard 1.7rc1
>>>>> Downloading http://downloads.reviewboard.**o**
>>>>> rg/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/**Re**viewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gz<http://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/ReviewBoard/1.7/ReviewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gz>
>>>>> Processing ReviewBoard-1.7rc1.tar.gz
>>>>> Running ReviewBoard-1.7rc1/setup.py -q bdist_egg --dist-dir
>>>>> /tmp/easy_install-vW-lSE/**Revie**wBoard-1.7rc1/egg-dist-**tmp-**
>>>>> DrI1Td
>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>   File "./contrib/internal/build-**medi**a.py", line 19, in ?
>>>>>     ret = call_command('collectstatic', interactive=False, verbosity=2)
>>>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packa**ges/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.**egg/
>>>>> **django/core/management/__**init_**_.py", line 153, in call_command
>>>>>     klass = load_command_class(app_name, name)
>>>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packa**ges/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.**egg/
>>>>> **django/core/management/__**init_**_.py", line 68, in
>>>>> load_command_class
>>>>>     return module.Command()
>>>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packa**ges/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.**egg/
>>>>> **django/contrib/**staticfiles/**management/**commands/**collectstatic.py",
>>>>> line 41, in __init__
>>>>>     self.storage = get_storage_class(settings.**STA**
>>>>> TICFILES_STORAGE)()
>>>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packa**ges/Django-1.3.4-py2.4.**egg/
>>>>> **django/core/files/storage.**py", line 265, in get_storage_class
>>>>>     raise ImproperlyConfigured('Error importing storage module %s:
>>>>> "%s"' % (module, e))
>>>>> django.core.exceptions.**Imprope**rlyConfigured: Error importing
>>>>> storage module pipeline.storage: "cannot import name CachedFilesMixin"
>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>>>>   File "/usr/bin/easy_install", line 7, in ?
>>>>>     sys.exit(
>>>>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-**packa**ges/setuptools-0.6c12dev_**
>>>>> r8884**6-py2.4.egg/setuptools/**command**/easy_install.py", line
>>>>> 1712, in main
>>>>> ..........
>>>>> snipped
>>>>> ...........
>>>>>     self.distribution.run_command(****command)
>>>>>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/**distutil**s/dist.py", line 966, in
>>>>> run_command
>>>>>     cmd_obj.run()
>>>>>   File "setup.py", line 63, in run
>>>>>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/**distutil**s/cmd.py", line 333, in
>>>>> run_command
>>>>>     self.distribution.run_command(****command)
>>>>>   File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/**distutil**s/dist.py", line 966, in
>>>>> run_command
>>>>>     cmd_obj.run()
>>>>>   File "setup.py", line 81, in run
>>>>> RuntimeError: Failed to build media files
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, November 30, 2012 3:38:07 AM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Review Board "Better Late Than Never" 1.7 RC 1 is out. We had hoped
>>>>>> to get this out earlier, but hit some problems and annoyances during some
>>>>>> production use that we felt should be fixed first. So trust me, it was
>>>>>> worth the wait :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's a lot of fixes, enhancements, and some small extension
>>>>>> interface changes in this release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See the news and release notes for more information.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.reviewboard.org/**new****s/2012/11/29/review-board-**1-7-*
>>>>>> ***rc-1-released/<http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2012/11/29/review-board-1-7-rc-1-released/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We'd like to ask those who plan to upgrade to 1.7 to please give it a
>>>>>> try. Aside from major fixes, we are hoping there won't be many changes 
>>>>>> made
>>>>>> until the final 1.7, so now's the time to report any regressions you hit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
>>>>>> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en


Reply via email to