On Saturday, February 16, 2013 1:13:02 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Matthew Woehlke
> > On 2013-02-15 15:29, Christian Hammond wrote:
> >> Yes, this is "correct" in that this is how it's known to work. It's not
> ideal, though. There are many things with interdiffs that could be
> improved, some easy to fix, some harder. This might not be so bad, if
> someone wanted to take it on. (I won't be able to get to it any time soon.)
> > On a related note, is there a public list of things to improve (other
> than issues floating around in the tracker)?
> There's no public list beyond the bug tracker and some long-term goals
> we've mentioned on reviewboard-dev (like the DVCS work we're going to do).
It would help a lot if the long-term goals and wanted-features-list (like a
roadmap) were put in a wiki on code.google.com. For folks who want to
contribute, it might be a good list to work on.
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.