On Saturday, February 16, 2013 1:13:02 PM UTC+5:30, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Matthew Woehlke 
> <mwoehlk...@gmail.com<javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
>
> > On 2013-02-15 15:29, Christian Hammond wrote: 
> >> Yes, this is "correct" in that this is how it's known to work. It's not 
> ideal, though. There are many things with interdiffs that could be 
> improved, some easy to fix, some harder. This might not be so bad, if 
> someone wanted to take it on. (I won't be able to get to it any time soon.) 
> > 
> > On a related note, is there a public list of things to improve (other 
> than issues floating around in the tracker)? 
>
> There's no public list beyond the bug tracker and some long-term goals 
> we've mentioned on reviewboard-dev (like the DVCS work we're going to do). 
>


It would help a lot if the long-term goals and wanted-features-list (like a 
roadmap) were put in a wiki on code.google.com. For folks who want to 
contribute, it might be a good list to work on. 

Thanks
Raja

-- 
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to