On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Matthew Woehlke
> On 2013-09-12 23:05, David Trowbridge wrote:
>> I'm not sure what that would look like. Comments are over a set of rows in
>> the side-by-side diff rather than a set of lines from either the old or
>> file. While it's possible that we could just pull out the relevant lines
>> from the changed revision of the file, it's likely that doing so would
>> a lot of the context for the comment. If we tried to mimic the HTML that
>> show by showing columns in plain text, my instinct is that it would be
>> hard to get formatted correctly, especially when mail clients wrap lines.
> ...maybe using unified diff format instead of trying to do side-by-side
> could 'fix' this? (You'd lose inter-line diff, but I suppose it would be
> better than nothing.)
If someone wrote a patch that made it work really well, I'd be open to
accepting it. I think there are going to be issues getting it work well. As
it is, our plates are too full to take this on.
Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.