Hi Lee, Can you show me exactly what you're seeing, with a debug log? We've been using RBTools 0.6 against RBCommons.com for some time, which runs 1.7.
We have no intention of tying this to the 2.0 releases. Christian On Wednesday, April 9, 2014, Lee Griffiths <podds...@gmail.com> wrote: > We're having some problems here using RBTools 0.6.0 on our outdated > version of Review Board. RBTools v0.5.7 worked fine. Whilst we go about > updating our version of Review Board I'd thought I'd check what the policy > is for RBTools being tied to specific versions of Review Board? > > > RBTools 0.6.0 makes use of absolute_url, which was only added to RB and > RBTools in 2013-11-16. However as far as I can tell from the patch notes it > was only released in the 2.0 branch in beta 2 and is not in 1.17? Therefore > RBTools 0.6.0 is tied to RB 2.0 B2 and up? > > If different versions of RBTools are meant to work only on specific > versions of Review Board? Or is it always "the latest? Could that be > documented on the web page? (Especially as the reviewboard webpage links to > RB 1.17.x and RBTools 0.6.x. Of course, it's possible that absoulte_url > could have sneaked into 1.17.17+, but I won't know that until I update and > see if it works :)). > > > > > > absolute_url added to rb > 2013-11-05 to 2013-11-16 > https://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/4902/ > > RBTools add use of absolute_url > 2013-11-16 > > https://github.com/reviewboard/rbtools/commit/999a2e04bbac6bdb70db9d40fcc4f54937ab43ca > mentioned in release notes for 2.0 b2 > http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/2.0-beta-2/ > > > http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/1.7.17/ > http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/1.7.18/ > http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/1.7.19/ -- > mentioned edward lee (but only mentions mirror path?) > http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/1.7.20/ > http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/1.7.21/ > http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/1.7.22/ > http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/releasenotes/reviewboard/1.7.23/ > > > On Monday, 7 April 2014 23:29:43 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote: >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> We just put out the all-new RBTools 0.6 release. We spent a lot of time >> improving the usability of RBTools, making it easier and faster to use. >> >> There's a lot going on with this release, and I've already written it up >> twice :) So instead, I'll point you all to the news post and release notes: >> >> http://www.reviewboard.org/news/2014/04/07/rbtools-0-6-released/ >> >> Christian >> >> -- >> Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com >> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org >> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com >> > -- -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com -- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.