Does anyone has any clue about why this is happening? On Thursday, 10 April 2014 17:11:51 UTC+5:30, neel roy wrote: > > Hi, > > I am using revieweboard and when I create diff using either post-review or > rbt, and upload that diff in reviewboard server I get following error: > > *Error:* The patch to '<filename>' didn't apply cleanly. The temporary > files have been left in '/tmp/reviewboard.PIc4WJ' for debugging purposes. > `patch` returned: patching file /tmp/reviewboard.PIc4WJ/tmp7AAVW9 patch: > **** malformed patch at line 10: > > When I looked at the patch I found that it really is malformed. So I > created a dummy file checked it in, modified it and created a patch. As you > can see below the entry near "@@ -20,6 +29,14 @@ See these resources for > further informat" will make it malformed (I have marked that section bold > but not sure whether it will show up as bold in every editor\browser). I > have tried with latest version of RBTools (rbt), one version prior to that > (post-review and rbt), and 0.4.1 (post-review). I have tried with 32 bit > python and setup tools as well as 64 bit. I have diffutils-2.8.7-1. The > only difference that I see is that other machines that I use where I have > my code and generate diff are 32 bit machines while this one is 64 bit > machine. Have you come across this issue before? How do I solve it? > > @@ -9,6 +9,15 @@ New unittest features including test ski > > A much faster io module > > Automatic numbering of fields in the str.format() method > > Float repr improvements backported from 3.x > > + > > + > > +Note: A newer bugfix release, 2.7.4, is currently available. Its use is > recommended over previous versions of 2.7. > > + > > +Python 2.7.3 was released on April 9, 2012. 2.7.3 includes fixes for > several reported security issues in 2.7.2: issue 13703 (oCERT-2011-003, > hash collision denial of service), issue 14234 (CVE-2012-0876, hash table > collisions CPU usage DoS in the expat library), issue 14001 (CVE-2012-0845, > SimpleXMLRPCServer denial of service), and issue 13885 (CVE-2011-3389, > disabling of the CBC IV attack countermeasure in the _ssl module). > > + > > +The Python 2.7 series is scheduled to be the last major version in the > 2.x series before 2.x moves into an extended maintenance period. The 2.7 > series contains many of the features that were first released in Python > 3.1. Improvements in this release include: > > + > > + > > * Tile support for Tkinter* > > * A backport of the memoryview object from 3.x* > > * Set literals* > > *@@ -20,6 +29,14 @@ See these resources for further informat* > > > > What's new in 2.7? > > Change log for this release. > > + > > +Note: A newer bugfix release, 2.7.4, is currently available. Its use is > recommended over previous versions of 2.7. > > + > > +Python 2.7.3 was released on April 9, 2012. 2.7.3 includes fixes for > several reported security issues in 2.7.2: issue 13703 (oCERT-2011-003, > hash collision denial of service), issue 14234 (CVE-2012-0876, hash table > collisions CPU usage DoS in the expat library), issue 14001 (CVE-2012-0845, > SimpleXMLRPCServer denial of service), and issue 13885 (CVE-2011-3389, > disabling of the CBC IV attack countermeasure in the _ssl module). > > + > > +The Python 2.7 series is scheduled to be the last major version in the > 2.x series before 2.x moves into an extended maintenance period. The 2.7 > series contains many of the features that were first released in Python > 3.1. Improvements in this release include: > > + > > + > > Online Documentation > > Report bugs at http://bugs.python.org. > > Help fund Python and its community. > > \ No newline at end of file > >
-- Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/ --- Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/ --- Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "reviewboard" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
