If the Pillow wheels contain support for all the image formats, and those get 
pulled in automatically through pip, then yes. Otherwise, the situation would 
be the same as it is today. We don't have really any control of how that's 
built, which is difficult. 
Unfortunately, none of the packaging stuff we're doing will affect the image 
libraries.

Basically, if 'easy_install Pillow' doesn't do the right thing, but 'pip 
install Pillow' does, then it should work.

Christian

--  
Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com  
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org  
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Dunnigan, Terrence J <terrence.j.dunni...@boeing.com>
Reply: reviewboard@googlegroups.com <reviewboard@googlegroups.com>>
Date: May 7, 2015 at 2:15:26 PM
To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com <reviewboard@googlegroups.com>>, 
kswee...@twitter.com <kswee...@twitter.com>>
Subject:  RE: can't pip install RBTools - no packages on pypi?

> Great news!
>  
> What about Review Board Power Pack? Will this resolve the issue (for some of 
> us) of obtaining  
> the correct imaging libraries?
>  
> Terry
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewboard@googlegroups.com] On  
> Behalf Of Christian Hammond
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2015 4:06 PM
> To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com; kswee...@twitter.com
> Subject: Re: can't pip install RBTools - no packages on pypi?
>  
> Hi Kevin,
>  
> The next releases of RBTools and Review Board will ship Wheels, which are 
> pip-compatible.  
> We have everything in place for this already.
>  
> We've also moved to a better scheme for verified URLs, meaning that pip won't 
> need the  
> `--allow-unverified` stuff anymore. Every single download URL and file 
> checksum is  
> now registered with PyPI, so that clients can download the package and be 
> absolutely  
> sure the contents are what they should be.
>  
> What we're still missing is the support for registered external indexes, 
> which pip and  
> PyPI don't yet have. So, it'll still be necessary to do 
> `--allow-all-external`. As soon  
> as they introduce compatibility for PEP 470, we'll be able to implement that 
> last bit,  
> finally giving everyone the ability to do a simple 'pip install RBTools'.
>  
> We don't have any issue in our tracker for this, but we're waiting for this 
> particular  
> issue: https://github.com/pypa/warehouse/issues/431
>  
> Christian
>  
> --
> Christian Hammond - christ...@beanbaginc.com Review Board - 
> https://www.reviewboard.org  
> Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kswee...@twitter.com  
> Reply: kswee...@twitter.com >
> Date: May 7, 2015 at 1:54:11 PM
> To: reviewboard@googlegroups.com >
> Cc: chip...@chipx86.com >
> Subject: Re: can't pip install RBTools - no packages on pypi?
>  
> > Hi Christian,
> >
> > Has there been any progress on these plans? Is there an issue I can watch?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Kevin
> >
> > On Wednesday, October 22, 2014 at 6:02:03 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Kevin,
> > >
> > > There's been some ongoing discussions about changes to pip and the
> > > strategy for verification/external packages. We're waiting to see
> > > how those impact us. In the meantime, we've made some of the changes
> > > needed to get us closer to not needing allow-unverified, but we're not 
> > > fully there  
> yet.
> > >
> > > There's no plan to move everything onto PyPI's hosting. It shouldn't
> > > matter down the road, from my understanding, but it does depend on
> > > the future plans for pip/PyPI.
> > >
> > > Christian
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, October 22, 2014, > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Apologies if this is already answered somewhere in history, but are
> > >> there any plans to revisit this change?
> > >>
> > >> We (Apache Aurora) use rbt in our development workflow via pip to
> > >> no apparent ill effect. We'd like to avoid the use of
> > >> --allow-unverified RBTools
> > >>
> > >> The currently-published version is only available via HTTP on a
> > >> server external to PyPI. That means it's vulnerable to MITMs and it
> > >> doesn't benefit from PyPI's caching infrastructure.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Kevin
> > >>
> > >> On Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:55:47 PM UTC-7, Buck Evan wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> For the record, the below command does result in a
> > >>> correctly-working rbt command.
> > >>>
> > >>> rbtools really should become compatible with the pip default options.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wednesday, August 6, 2014 2:17:37 PM UTC-7, David Trowbridge wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> That will install the package, but I believe pip still doesn't
> > >>>> properly register python entry points, which means that rbt won't work 
> > >>>> right.  
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -David
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Aug 6, 2014, at 2:04 PM, Edward Delaporte wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> For what it's worth, there seems to be a combination of command
> > >>>> line flags that works as a workaround:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> pip install rbtools --allow-external rbtools --allow-unverified
> > >>>> rbtools
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wednesday, May 7, 2014 8:03:11 AM UTC-5, Jason Antman wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I'm aware that pip is not a supported installation method for
> > >>>>> ReviewBoard itself. However, I have a number of cases where pip
> > >>>>> installation is the only method I can do, and I only need access
> > >>>>> to RBTools for the API client.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> As of a few months ago, I was able to `pip install
> > >>>>> RBTools==0.5.2` without a problem, and I have this in a number of 
> > >>>>> requirements.txt  
> files.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> This morning I tried re-deploying one of the applications that
> > >>>>> uses this, and got an error from pip saying "No distributions at
> > >>>>> all found" - there don't seem to be any valid packages on pypi
> > >>>>> itself, and even having it allow external URLs doesn't seem to work.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Is this an intentional change in behavior?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>> Jason
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/
> > >>>> powerpack/
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons:
> > >>>> https://rbcommons.com/
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > >>>> ---
> > >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > >>>> Google Groups "reviewboard" group.
> > >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> > >>>> send an email to reviewboard...@googlegroups.com.
> > >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >> Get the Review Board Power Pack at
> > >> http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> > >> ---
> > >> Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons:
> > >> https://rbcommons.com/
> > >> ---
> > >> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> > >> ---
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >> Groups "reviewboard" group.
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> > >> send an email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com Review Board -
> > > http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
> > >
> > >
>  
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/  
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
> https://rbcommons.com/ Happy  
> user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard"  
> group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.  
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>  
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/  
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "reviewboard"  
> group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.  
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>  

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to