I occasionally see bugs when using "rbt post" to push up multiple drafts
before I publish. I suspect that a previous draft is cached server side,
browser cache clearing and memcached restarts fail to fix the issue.
Repeat use of "rbt post" following local code changes doesn't always result
in visible changes on the interdiff web page. I haven't been able to
reliably reproduce this and can't share the specific diffs in question as
the code is private.
Also, I've seen occasions where I can see the change in the side-by-side
diff viewer (e.g. lines deleted), however the lines are not always colour
coded to highlight the change as expected.
I'm using RB 2.0.18.
Sorry, I just noticed I previously asked if the 2.5 interdiff changes were
relevant for RB1.7, I should have asked if they were relevant to RB2.0 as
that's the version I've had interdiff viewing problems with.
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 9:35:30 PM UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> These fixes are not. Interdiffs were largely rewritten since 1.7 and
> behave differently. We've had further changes since 2.0 (though we may
> backport some of these fixes).
> Are there particular fixes you're interested in?
> Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
> Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 3:30 AM, Paul Fee <paul....@gmail.com
>> Hi Christian,
>> I see this line in the 2.5 Beta 2 release notes:
>> * Diff Viewer - Fixed some problems with interdiffs resulting from
>> rebased changes
>> Are these fixes applicable to the 1.7 release branch?
>> On Monday, July 20, 2015 at 7:54:36 PM UTC+1, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 1:30 PM Christian Hammond <
>>> chri...@beanbaginc.com> wrote:
>>>> Hey everyone,
>>>> We've put out the second beta of Review Board 2.5. We're hoping to wrap
>>>> this release cycle up soon, get an RC out the door in the next two weeks
>>>> and then ship the final 2.5 release shortly after. We'd love your testing
>>>> to help make this happen.
>>>> You can read our announcement, complete with screenshots, here:
>>>> We also have an announcements mailing list available, for those not on
>>>> it: https://www.reviewboard.org/mailing-lists/
>>>> And as a reminder, we're posting the latest development news, feature
>>>> additions, design ideas, etc. over at the Review Board ChangeLog:
>>> I've also created a new COPR repository for Fedora 21+ and RHEL/CentOS
>>> 7. You can now download and install Review Board 2.5 beta 2 for evaluation
>>> on those platforms. Browse to
>>> https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sgallagh/reviewboard2.5/ and
>>> install the appropriate repository file into /etc/yum.repos.d, then do 'yum
>>> install ReviewBoard'. If you already have Review Board on the target
>>> system, back it up and then just do 'yum update ReviewBoard' (after having
>>> installed the repo file, of course).
>>> Yum may prompt you to accept the signing key for these new packages;
>>> that key should be:
>>> f836 fa56 6e04 caa8 832f 6efd fa1d d63c 353c 6a28
>> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
>> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
>> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "reviewboard" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.