Was there ever any progress made here? I notice that the old `post-review`
but the new RBTools==0.7.4 only has --username and --password which do not
use basic auth against the api.
Our company uses single-sign-on with fallback to basic auth (which
authenticates against active directory) and this feature will be important
to our users as well.
>>> Making HTTP GET request to http://reviewboard/api/
>>> Got HTTP error: 401
On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 at 1:38:03 AM UTC-4, Pierre Mariani wrote:
> We use Review Board at work. It is installed on a web server that
> is protected by HTTP Basic Authentication.
> We haven't been able to use RBTools to interact with it as we
> couldn't find the right configuration to pass this authentication
> After looking through the code, I didn't see how it could be
> configured at all, and came to the conclusion that this feature
> wasn't supported.
> I also didn't find an obvious way to modify
> ReviewBoardHTTPBasicAuthHandler or ReviewBoardHTTPPasswordMgr to
> add that feature.
> I resorted to defining a new server option, and passing it
> through RBClient, SyncTransport and finally to ReviewBoardServer,
> where it is used to define a new urllib2.HTTPBasicAuthHandler
> which gets added to the list of handlers.
> You can see the diff at
> It's hacky but good enough for my use case. However, I would
> rather not maintain a fork and would like to be able to push
> similar changes back to the main RBTools repo.
> Can someone confirm that HTTP Basic Authentication isn't currently
> in RBTools?
> Are there design resources that would let me adapt my hack to
> something acceptable by the project?
> Thank you
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.