I thought I would reopen this old thread to see if any innovations that I'm 
not aware of have occurred on this front or if others in the community have 
come up with new creative ways to address this problem.

I've reached the conclusion that some folks really use the issue list as a 
crutch and have a tendency to overlook or forget about non-issue comments.  
Thus I've gotten to the point where I almost always open an issue for every 
comment I make, even if it is something that I view more as a question and 
not necessarily issue worthy, just so it will catch the submitter's eye.  
This is fine for files that are included in the diff, but where there are 
more global problems I find that I have no option but to discuss these in 
either the review header or footer section, and there is not a way to flag 
these as issues.  I'd say about half the time things I bring up in the 
header/footer don't end up getting addressed until I bring them up a second 

I'd love to be able to open up arbitrary/unbound issue(s), or even just 
generally flag the the header/footer as containing an issue, but short of 
that it might be helpful if there was a little bit more of a visual 
delineation between the review header and the first comment (perhaps RB 2.5 
will help with this, but I'm not using that in a production environment 
yet) .

Has anyone else found good ways to ensure that problems called out in 
header/footer comments are not ignored?


On Friday, December 7, 2012 at 2:55:36 PM UTC-5, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Matthew, 
> There's no support for that today. This is less an issue thing and more a 
> comment thing. We tie issues to comments, and comments to some part of a 
> file/diff. The exception being that you can leave a general summary comment 
> on a review, but that works differently internally and making it work in 
> such a way where multiple issues could be filed would be a rather large 
> change. 
> I'm not sure what the best solution would be for your needs right now. Any 
> solution would involve conceiving of and implementing a new design. 
> Christian 
> On Dec 7, 2012, at 11:52 AM, Matthew Woehlke <mwoehlk...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > Is it possible to create an issue for a review request without it being 
> associated with a code comment? (I don't see a way, but want to check if 
> I'm missing something before filing an enhancement request.) 
> > 
> > The use case I am thinking of is that I go to test a patch and discover 
> that it has e.g. introduced a behavioral regression, but don't know what 
> specific code is the culprit. I think it makes sense for tracking purposes 
> to be able to open an issue describing the problem, rather than just a 
> review stating that a problem exists. 
> > 
> > Thanks, 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Matthew 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at 
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/ 
> > Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/ 
> > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- 
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> reviewboard...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> 
> > For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en 
> > 
> > 

Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"reviewboard" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to