Hi Adam,

Hopefully not, but if so, you can force a downgrade of oauthlib to 1.0.1.
I’ll look into what we might be able to do about this on our end.

If it is a problem, it will manifest as your Authentication Backends or
repository type options being limited to a couple of hard-codes types. It’s
not a great indicator, but the problem comes from deep in the Python
packaging and registrations layers. We’re working toward improving this.

Christian


On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:33 Adam Weremczuk <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> On Debian 10 "sudo pip install ReviewBoard" produces:
>
> ERROR: django-oauth-toolkit 0.9.0 has requirement oauthlib==1.0.1, but
> you'll have oauthlib 3.1.0 which is incompatible.
>
> but then appears to happily continue:
>
> Installing collected packages: django-braces, Pillow, pillowfight,
> futures, django-pipeline, feedparser, publicsuffix, python-dateutil, pytz,
> Django, dnspython, Djblets, oauthlib, urllib3, certifi, chardet, idna,
> requests, requests-oauthlib, markdown, django-haystack, django-evolution,
> docutils, Whoosh, asana, PyYAML, rbintegrations, django-multiselectfield,
> django-oauth-toolkit, pycparser, cffi, pynacl, bcrypt, paramiko,
> python-memcached, django-cors-headers, mimeparse, Pygments,
> pymdown-extensions, ReviewBoard
> Successfully installed Django-1.6.11 Djblets-1.0.13 Pillow-6.2.2
> PyYAML-5.3.1 Pygments-2.5.2 ReviewBoard-3.0.18 Whoosh-2.7.4 asana-0.10.0
> bcrypt-3.1.7 certifi-2020.6.20 cffi-1.14.0 chardet-3.0.4
> django-braces-1.13.0 django-cors-headers-1.1.0 django-evolution-0.7.8
> django-haystack-2.4.1 django-multiselectfield-0.1.12
> django-oauth-toolkit-0.9.0 django-pipeline-1.6.14 dnspython-1.16.0
> docutils-0.16 feedparser-5.2.1 futures-3.3.0 idna-2.10 markdown-2.6.11
> mimeparse-0.1.3 oauthlib-3.1.0 paramiko-2.7.1 pillowfight-0.3
> publicsuffix-1.1.1 pycparser-2.20 pymdown-extensions-3.5 pynacl-1.4.0
> python-dateutil-2.8.1 python-memcached-1.59 pytz-2020.1
> rbintegrations-1.0.1 requests-2.24.0 requests-oauthlib-1.0.0 urllib3-1.25.10
>
> I didn't get this error when I ran in on Debian 9 a few months ago.
>
> Do I have anything to worry about?
>
> Thanks,
> Adam
>
> --
> Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
> https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
> Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
> https://rbcommons.com/
> Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Review Board Community" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/CALC-DAHTCZ7DyCsajEKVcUxWC9_HXgPNmcEFgZGb6exqh2OQuA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/CALC-DAHTCZ7DyCsajEKVcUxWC9_HXgPNmcEFgZGb6exqh2OQuA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
-- 
-- 
Christian Hammond
President/CEO of Beanbag
Makers of Review Board

-- 
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack: 
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons: 
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Review Board Community" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/reviewboard/CAE7VndndRViH1NjwVtPwLEKcWbC_e0monx_xu09MXjs0z%3Dy3nw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to