-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46046/#review128236
-----------------------------------------------------------


Ship it!




Ship It!

- Alejandro Fernandez


On April 11, 2016, 7:27 p.m., Nate Cole wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46046/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 11, 2016, 7:27 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Alejandro Fernandez, Jonathan Hurley, and Sumit 
> Mohanty.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-15810
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-15810
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The API is filtering Request objects in an inconsistent manner.  When 
> accessing /clusters/c1/requests, the db query includes non-cluster calls, 
> which get filtered out.  The UI then sees the count returned less than the 
> count asked for, and does not allow any more queries.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/RequestResourceProvider.java
>  c1e9053 
>   
> ambari-server/src/main/java/org/apache/ambari/server/orm/dao/RequestDAO.java 
> dcbf2a6 
>   
> ambari-server/src/test/java/org/apache/ambari/server/controller/internal/RequestResourceProviderTest.java
>  bbb55f3 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46046/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manual.  Automated:
> 
> Tests run: 4132, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 32
> 
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 36:41.820s
> [INFO] Finished at: Mon Apr 11 14:17:50 EDT 2016
> [INFO] Final Memory: 34M/766M
> [INFO] 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Nate Cole
> 
>

Reply via email to