> On May 4, 2016, 4:45 p.m., Alexander Denissov wrote:
> > ambari-common/src/main/python/resource_management/libraries/functions/namenode_ha_utils.py,
> >  line 143
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/diff/1/?file=1370315#file1370315line143>
> >
> >     The code in line 57 is:
> >     
> >     raise Fail('No active NameNode was found.')
> >     
> >     Should the same be done here for consistency ?

Modified.


- jun


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/#review131705
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 4, 2016, 9:28 p.m., jun aoki wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 4, 2016, 9:28 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-16237
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-16237
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> PXF alerts shows "Configuration parameter 'fs_root' was not found in 
> configurations dictionary!" when both namnodes are down on secured NN HA 
> environment, which the error message is not too clear.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ambari-common/src/main/python/resource_management/libraries/functions/namenode_ha_utils.py
>  ee16c9b 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/46949/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manually tested.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jun aoki
> 
>

Reply via email to