> On June 24, 2016, 8:04 p.m., Alejandro Fernandez wrote:
> > ambari-agent/etc/init.d/ambari-agent, line 22
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/49188/diff/1/?file=1429559#file1429559line22>
> >
> >     These are only code comments, what's the fix?

Newer linux distributions use systemd for managing services. systemd supports 
the  '/etc/init.d' scripts as well via 'insserv' but that requires this LSB 
section to be added to the start script of the service.

Without this when someone executes 'update-rc.d ambari-server disable' to 
remove ambari to be restarted in case the host is rebooted the user will get an 
error: 'update-rc.d: error: ambari-server Default-Start contains no runlevels, 
aborting.' 

This is the format how Linux Standard Base has to be specified.


- Sebastian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/49188/#review139390
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 24, 2016, 9:56 a.m., Sebastian Toader wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/49188/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 24, 2016, 9:56 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Ambari, Alejandro Fernandez and Andrew Onischuk.
> 
> 
> Bugs: AMBARI-17419
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMBARI-17419
> 
> 
> Repository: ambari
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Trying do disable auto-start for ambari-server by executing update-rc.d 
> ambari-server disable is failing with update-rc.d: error: ambari-server 
> Default-Start contains no runlevels, aborting.
> 
> Added LSB to ambari-server and amabri-agent to define the default start and 
> stop levels
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   ambari-agent/etc/init.d/ambari-agent b2c3109 
>   ambari-server/sbin/ambari-server 72d94ed 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/49188/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sebastian Toader
> 
>

Reply via email to